Comparison Overview

Fox River Valley Public Library District

VS

Sea Cliff Village Library

Fox River Valley Public Library District

555 Barrington Ave, East Dundee, IL, 60118, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Fox River Valley Public Library District serves 70,000+ residents of East Dundee, West Dundee, Carpentersville, Gilberts, Sleepy Hollow, and parts of Algonquin, Barrington Hills, and Elgin. FRVPLD is the seventh largest out of 340 library districts in Illinois. Our vision is to provide equal opportunity for all to learn, explore, imagine, create, and connect in a welcoming environment.

NAICS: 519
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 36
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Sea Cliff Village Library

300 SEA CLIFF AVE, Sea Cliff, New York, US, 11579
Last Update: 2025-11-27

The Sea Cliff Village Library enriches the community through access to the ideas, information and entertainment available from books as well as from a variety of other resources. To this end, the Library provides an array of material, services and professional assistance as well as facilities for the support of educational, civic, and cultural activities.

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dundee-township-public-library-district.jpeg
Fox River Valley Public Library District
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sea-cliff-village-library.jpeg
Sea Cliff Village Library
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Fox River Valley Public Library District
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sea Cliff Village Library
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fox River Valley Public Library District in 2025.

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sea Cliff Village Library in 2025.

Incident History — Fox River Valley Public Library District (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fox River Valley Public Library District cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sea Cliff Village Library (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sea Cliff Village Library cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dundee-township-public-library-district.jpeg
Fox River Valley Public Library District
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sea-cliff-village-library.jpeg
Sea Cliff Village Library
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sea Cliff Village Library company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fox River Valley Public Library District company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Sea Cliff Village Library company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Fox River Valley Public Library District company.

In the current year, Sea Cliff Village Library company and Fox River Valley Public Library District company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sea Cliff Village Library company nor Fox River Valley Public Library District company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Sea Cliff Village Library company nor Fox River Valley Public Library District company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Sea Cliff Village Library company nor Fox River Valley Public Library District company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Fox River Valley Public Library District company nor Sea Cliff Village Library company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Fox River Valley Public Library District nor Sea Cliff Village Library holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Fox River Valley Public Library District company nor Sea Cliff Village Library company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Fox River Valley Public Library District company employs more people globally than Sea Cliff Village Library company, reflecting its scale as a Libraries.

Neither Fox River Valley Public Library District nor Sea Cliff Village Library holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Fox River Valley Public Library District nor Sea Cliff Village Library holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Fox River Valley Public Library District nor Sea Cliff Village Library holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Fox River Valley Public Library District nor Sea Cliff Village Library holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Fox River Valley Public Library District nor Sea Cliff Village Library holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Fox River Valley Public Library District nor Sea Cliff Village Library holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H