Comparison Overview

DRH Health

VS

Sutter Health

DRH Health

1407 N Whisenant Dr., Duncan, Oklahoma, 73533, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 700 and 749

DRH Health is a progressive, not-for-profit community hospital that is constantly evolving to meet the ever-changing needs of the community. Our team of dedicated healthcare professionals is committed to delivering compassionate, personalized service and care to our patients and their families. DRH Health is committed to: Delivering a seamless, state-of-the-art health services environment Exceeding the expectations of those we serve. Making our patients’ ideal encounter a reality. Providing personalized care and service with a commitment to excellence.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 196
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Sutter Health

2200 River Plaza Drive, None, Sacramento, California, US, 95833
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 650 and 699

Sutter Health is a not-for-profit, people-centered healthcare system providing comprehensive care throughout California. Sutter Health is committed to innovative, high-quality patient care and community partnerships, and innovative, high-quality patient care. Today, Sutter Health is pursuing a bold new plan to reach more people and make excellent healthcare more connected and accessible. The health system’s 57,000+ staff and clinicians and 12,000+ affiliated physicians currently serve more than 3 million patients with a focus on expanding opportunities to serve patients, people and communities better. Sutter Health provides exceptional, affordable care through its hospitals, medical groups, ambulatory surgery centers, urgent care clinics, telehealth, home health and hospice services. Dedicated to transforming healthcare, at Sutter Health, getting better never stops. Learn more about how Sutter Health is transforming healthcare at sutterhealth.org and vitals.sutterhealth.org.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 23,594
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/duncanregionalhospital.jpeg
DRH Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sutter-health.jpeg
Sutter Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
DRH Health
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sutter Health
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DRH Health in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sutter Health in 2025.

Incident History — DRH Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DRH Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sutter Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sutter Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/duncanregionalhospital.jpeg
DRH Health
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2022
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 01/2022
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sutter-health.jpeg
Sutter Health
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Zero-day vulnerability in MOVEit Transfer programme
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Exploitation of MOVEit Transfer Server Vulnerability
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 06/2018
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Insider Threat
Motivation: Unknown
Blog: Blog

FAQ

DRH Health company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sutter Health company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Sutter Health company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to DRH Health company.

In the current year, Sutter Health company and DRH Health company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sutter Health company nor DRH Health company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both Sutter Health company and DRH Health company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

DRH Health company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Sutter Health company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither DRH Health company nor Sutter Health company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither DRH Health nor Sutter Health holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither DRH Health company nor Sutter Health company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Sutter Health company employs more people globally than DRH Health company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither DRH Health nor Sutter Health holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither DRH Health nor Sutter Health holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither DRH Health nor Sutter Health holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither DRH Health nor Sutter Health holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither DRH Health nor Sutter Health holds HIPAA certification.

Neither DRH Health nor Sutter Health holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X