Comparison Overview

Duna

VS

Juniper Systems Limited

Duna

Bul. 8-mi Septemvri No. 18, Skopje, 1000, MK
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 800 and 849

Duna is a leading Macedonian IT company, which provides complete integration and maintenance in companies, mobile solutions and document management. During its last 17 years, Duna has developed itself into an expert on corporative projects and has become known for its mobile software distribution solutions. Duna is an exclusive importer of world famous brands - Apple, RICOH, OKI, Psion, Clasus Interactive Whiteboards, Brahler ICS, Tentnology; distributor of Garmin; HP preferred partner; Adobe and Corel partner; manufacturer of fiscal cash registers Bravo; developer of ERP ULTIMA® software - Distribution, Standard, Professional and Enterprise.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 102
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Juniper Systems Limited

The Old Forge, Hewell Lane, None, Tardebigge, Worcestershire, GB, B97 6QL
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Based in Birmingham, UK, Juniper Systems Limited is the EMEA branch of Juniper Systems, Inc., a world leader in the design and manufacture of ultra-rugged handheld computers. Serving Europe, U.K., Middle East, Africa, and India, we deliver field data collection solutions for use in extreme environments. Since 1993, professionals have relied on Juniper Systems’ innovative mobile technology in the geomatics, industrial, natural resources, utilities and public services, and military markets.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/duna-computers.jpeg
Duna
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/juniper-systems-ltd-.jpeg
Juniper Systems Limited
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Duna
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Juniper Systems Limited
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Duna in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Juniper Systems Limited in 2025.

Incident History — Duna (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Duna cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Juniper Systems Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Juniper Systems Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/duna-computers.jpeg
Duna
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/juniper-systems-ltd-.jpeg
Juniper Systems Limited
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Duna company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Juniper Systems Limited company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Juniper Systems Limited company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Duna company.

In the current year, Juniper Systems Limited company and Duna company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Juniper Systems Limited company nor Duna company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Juniper Systems Limited company nor Duna company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Juniper Systems Limited company nor Duna company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Duna company nor Juniper Systems Limited company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Duna nor Juniper Systems Limited holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Duna company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Juniper Systems Limited company.

Neither Duna nor Juniper Systems Limited holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Duna nor Juniper Systems Limited holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Duna nor Juniper Systems Limited holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Duna nor Juniper Systems Limited holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Duna nor Juniper Systems Limited holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Duna nor Juniper Systems Limited holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H