Comparison Overview

DTDC Express Limited

VS

bpost

DTDC Express Limited

DTDC House, No. 3,, Victoria Road,, Bangalore, Karnataka, IN, 560047
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

DTDC Express Ltd is one of India’s leading integrated express logistics company offering domestic and international services. DTDC offers a comprehensive range of technology-enabled logistics services, serving a wide spectrum of customers across diverse industry verticals. Today, DTDC operates India’s largest physically accessible express logistics network and has over 15,000 exclusive channel partners which contribute to its sales and service capabilities.

NAICS: 47
NAICS Definition: Transportation and Warehousing
Employees: 11,367
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

bpost

Boulevard Anspach Box 1 Brussels, Brussels Region 1000, BE
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

bpost creates real connections between people, businesses and communities. We’re not just moving letters and parcels around, but we want to deliver personal service at every doorstep. It’s an important job, and we aim to do it better every day. That’s why we constantly keep improving our products and services. Needless to say, bpost is always on the move. Our employees come across challenging projects, inspiring collaborations and the latest technologies. At the same time, they have access to exciting job opportunities and training programs. Will you take bpost to its new destination? Check out bpost.be/jobs to watch employee videos, take a tour of bpost and discover all open jobs.

NAICS: 47
NAICS Definition: Transportation and Warehousing
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dtdc-express-limited.jpeg
DTDC Express Limited
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bpost.jpeg
bpost
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
DTDC Express Limited
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
bpost
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DTDC Express Limited in 2025.

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for bpost in 2025.

Incident History — DTDC Express Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DTDC Express Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — bpost (X = Date, Y = Severity)

bpost cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dtdc-express-limited.jpeg
DTDC Express Limited
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bpost.jpeg
bpost
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

DTDC Express Limited company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to bpost company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, bpost company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to DTDC Express Limited company.

In the current year, bpost company and DTDC Express Limited company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither bpost company nor DTDC Express Limited company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither bpost company nor DTDC Express Limited company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither bpost company nor DTDC Express Limited company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither DTDC Express Limited company nor bpost company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither DTDC Express Limited nor bpost holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither DTDC Express Limited company nor bpost company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

DTDC Express Limited company employs more people globally than bpost company, reflecting its scale as a Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage.

Neither DTDC Express Limited nor bpost holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither DTDC Express Limited nor bpost holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither DTDC Express Limited nor bpost holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither DTDC Express Limited nor bpost holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither DTDC Express Limited nor bpost holds HIPAA certification.

Neither DTDC Express Limited nor bpost holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H