Comparison Overview

DSV - Global Transport and Logistics

VS

Sandd

DSV - Global Transport and Logistics

Hovedgaden 630, Hedehusene, DK, 2640
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 800 and 849

At DSV, we keep supply chains flowing in a world of change. We provide and manage supply chain solutions for thousands of companies every day – from small family-run businesses to large global corporations. Our reach is global, yet our presence is local and close to our customers. Approx. 160,000 employees in over 90 countries work passionately to deliver great customer experiences and high-quality services. We aspire to lead the way towards a more sustainable future for our industry and are committed to trading on nature’s terms. DSV is a dynamic organisation that fosters inclusivity and diversity. We conduct our business with integrity, respecting different cultures and the dignity and rights of individuals. Read more at www.dsv.com.

NAICS: 47
NAICS Definition: Transportation and Warehousing
Employees: 44,731
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Sandd

IJsseldijk 2 Apeldoorn, 7325 WZ, NL
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Sandd is a Dutch postal company that focuses on the delivery of addressed bulk mail, such as direct mail and subscription magazines. Since the liberalization of the Dutch postal market in 2009 Sandd also focuses on transaction mail such as invoices and policies. Sandd wants her clients connect with their audiences through products and transmit information, provide and improve with the goal of any accurate, timely and reliable information, motivation and activation. Sandd distributes fixed delivery days via a self-built nationwide network. We are an innovative organization that responds to new developments in the postal market. This translates into a high level of service and attractive pricing. You can reach us by phone at 055-368 25 25 or email at [email protected]. Visit us also look at www.sandd.nl.

NAICS: 47
NAICS Definition: Transportation and Warehousing
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dsv.jpeg
DSV - Global Transport and Logistics
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sandd.jpeg
Sandd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
DSV - Global Transport and Logistics
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sandd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DSV - Global Transport and Logistics in 2025.

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sandd in 2025.

Incident History — DSV - Global Transport and Logistics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DSV - Global Transport and Logistics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sandd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sandd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dsv.jpeg
DSV - Global Transport and Logistics
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sandd.jpeg
Sandd
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

DSV - Global Transport and Logistics company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sandd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Sandd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to DSV - Global Transport and Logistics company.

In the current year, Sandd company and DSV - Global Transport and Logistics company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sandd company nor DSV - Global Transport and Logistics company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Sandd company nor DSV - Global Transport and Logistics company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Sandd company nor DSV - Global Transport and Logistics company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither DSV - Global Transport and Logistics company nor Sandd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither DSV - Global Transport and Logistics nor Sandd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither DSV - Global Transport and Logistics company nor Sandd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

DSV - Global Transport and Logistics company employs more people globally than Sandd company, reflecting its scale as a Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage.

Neither DSV - Global Transport and Logistics nor Sandd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither DSV - Global Transport and Logistics nor Sandd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither DSV - Global Transport and Logistics nor Sandd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither DSV - Global Transport and Logistics nor Sandd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither DSV - Global Transport and Logistics nor Sandd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither DSV - Global Transport and Logistics nor Sandd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X