Comparison Overview

Drukkerij Groels

VS

Tandy Limited

Drukkerij Groels

De Grote Beer 10, ’s-Hertogenbosch, 5215 MP, NL
Last Update: 2025-12-13

Drukkerij Groels (fsc gecertificeerd) staat voor kwaliteit en innovatie! Ervaren vakmensen en de laatste technologie gecombineerd in 1 hybride bedrijf. Onze relaties kiezen bewust voor ons concept: druk & print & afwerking in eigen huis. Specialiteiten zijn: 3d lak, (laser)stansen, foliedruk, metallicdruk Om meer resultaat uit de communicatie-inspanningen te halen bieden we ook crossmediale diensten aan. We helpen daarmee uw doelstellingen te realiseren met print, online en digitale media. Voor specialistisch werk neemt u contact op met een van onze accountmanagers en voor het standaard-drukwerk, in kleine oplagen, kunt u ook gebruik maken van onze webportal www.ipress4u.nl. Bekijk op www.groels.nl de verdere mogelijkheden.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Tandy Limited

WD24 4YE, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 800 and 849

Commercial printing company producing Litho, Digital and Large Format print and design, including conceptual marketing and branding for SME's and Corporate markets. Specializing in bespoke on-line purchasing and ordering facilities, re-branding and print solutions. A new range of customisable display and presentation materials are now available for conferance and seminar applications.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/drukkerij-groels.jpeg
Drukkerij Groels
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tandy-limited.jpeg
Tandy Limited
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Drukkerij Groels
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tandy Limited
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Drukkerij Groels in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tandy Limited in 2025.

Incident History — Drukkerij Groels (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Drukkerij Groels cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tandy Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tandy Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/drukkerij-groels.jpeg
Drukkerij Groels
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tandy-limited.jpeg
Tandy Limited
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Tandy Limited company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Drukkerij Groels company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Tandy Limited company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Drukkerij Groels company.

In the current year, Tandy Limited company and Drukkerij Groels company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Tandy Limited company nor Drukkerij Groels company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Tandy Limited company nor Drukkerij Groels company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Tandy Limited company nor Drukkerij Groels company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Drukkerij Groels company nor Tandy Limited company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Drukkerij Groels nor Tandy Limited holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Drukkerij Groels company nor Tandy Limited company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Tandy Limited company employs more people globally than Drukkerij Groels company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Drukkerij Groels nor Tandy Limited holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Drukkerij Groels nor Tandy Limited holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Drukkerij Groels nor Tandy Limited holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Drukkerij Groels nor Tandy Limited holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Drukkerij Groels nor Tandy Limited holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Drukkerij Groels nor Tandy Limited holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N