Comparison Overview

Drents Museum

VS

Wyck Historic House, Garden and Farm

Drents Museum

Brink 1, Assen, Drenthe, NL, 9400 AC
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 600 and 649

Het Drents Museum is een museum van internationale allure dat jong én oud inspireert met verhalen over archeologie, kunst en geschiedenis. Een echte publiekstrekker, niet alleen door zijn veelzijdige vaste collectie, maar zeker ook door de grote spraakmakende tentoonstellingen. Het museum geldt als een van de topattracties van Drenthe en trekt bezoekers uit het hele land naar Assen. Het Drents Museum staat voor gastvrijheid, kwaliteit, ambitie, betrouwbaarheid, ondernemerschap en samenwerking en levert een belangrijke bijdrage aan het culturele, toeristische én economische klimaat in de provincie Drenthe.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 58
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Wyck Historic House, Garden and Farm

Wyck Association, Philadelphia, 19144, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

Welcome to Wyck, a National Historic Landmark in the heart of the historic Germantown neighborhood of Philadelphia. Wyck served as the ancestral home to one Germantown family, the Wistar-Haines, from 1690 to 1973. Here, traditional Quaker culture blended with a passion for innovation. The people who lived and worked at Wyck expressed these values through their commitment to education, horticulture, natural history, and preservation. Wyck connects this family and its rich history to our community today through educational, often experiential programs that focus on local history, horticulture, urban agriculture, and heritage conservation, using the past as inspiration for the future.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/drents-museum.jpeg
Drents Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wyck-historic-house-garden-and-farm.jpeg
Wyck Historic House, Garden and Farm
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Drents Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Wyck Historic House, Garden and Farm
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

Drents Museum has 20.48% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wyck Historic House, Garden and Farm in 2025.

Incident History — Drents Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Drents Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Wyck Historic House, Garden and Farm (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wyck Historic House, Garden and Farm cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/drents-museum.jpeg
Drents Museum
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Physical Break-In
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wyck-historic-house-garden-and-farm.jpeg
Wyck Historic House, Garden and Farm
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Wyck Historic House, Garden and Farm company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Drents Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Drents Museum company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Wyck Historic House, Garden and Farm company has not reported any.

In the current year, Drents Museum company has reported more cyber incidents than Wyck Historic House, Garden and Farm company.

Neither Wyck Historic House, Garden and Farm company nor Drents Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Drents Museum company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Wyck Historic House, Garden and Farm company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Wyck Historic House, Garden and Farm company nor Drents Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Drents Museum company nor Wyck Historic House, Garden and Farm company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Drents Museum nor Wyck Historic House, Garden and Farm holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Drents Museum company nor Wyck Historic House, Garden and Farm company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Drents Museum company employs more people globally than Wyck Historic House, Garden and Farm company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Drents Museum nor Wyck Historic House, Garden and Farm holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Drents Museum nor Wyck Historic House, Garden and Farm holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Drents Museum nor Wyck Historic House, Garden and Farm holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Drents Museum nor Wyck Historic House, Garden and Farm holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Drents Museum nor Wyck Historic House, Garden and Farm holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Drents Museum nor Wyck Historic House, Garden and Farm holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X