Comparison Overview

Draycast Foundries Limited

VS

X-Cel Technologies, Inc.

Draycast Foundries Limited

Bellingdon Road, Chesham, HP5 2NR, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Draycast manufacture aluminium, aluminium bronze castings for numerous companies in the UK and Europe. Castings are produced using both sand and die casting processes at our bespoke foundry in Chesham, Bucks. We provide a full sourcing service including machining and finishing operations. Service and quality are cornerstones of our business.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

X-Cel Technologies, Inc.

7800 Graphics Drive, Tinley Park, 60477, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Our 40,000 square foot CNC facility features an arsenal of precision equipment to tackle the high volume milling demands of today's market. We specialize in tight tolerance precision machining. Located in the Southwest Suburbs of Chicago, X-Cel is your manufacturing solution with our 4 and 5 axis milling, state of the art equipment and cutting edge software.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/draycast-foundries-limited.jpeg
Draycast Foundries Limited
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/x-cel-technologies-inc.jpeg
X-Cel Technologies, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Draycast Foundries Limited
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
X-Cel Technologies, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Draycast Foundries Limited in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for X-Cel Technologies, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Draycast Foundries Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Draycast Foundries Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — X-Cel Technologies, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

X-Cel Technologies, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/draycast-foundries-limited.jpeg
Draycast Foundries Limited
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/x-cel-technologies-inc.jpeg
X-Cel Technologies, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

X-Cel Technologies, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Draycast Foundries Limited company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, X-Cel Technologies, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Draycast Foundries Limited company.

In the current year, X-Cel Technologies, Inc. company and Draycast Foundries Limited company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither X-Cel Technologies, Inc. company nor Draycast Foundries Limited company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither X-Cel Technologies, Inc. company nor Draycast Foundries Limited company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither X-Cel Technologies, Inc. company nor Draycast Foundries Limited company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Draycast Foundries Limited company nor X-Cel Technologies, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Draycast Foundries Limited nor X-Cel Technologies, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Draycast Foundries Limited company nor X-Cel Technologies, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

X-Cel Technologies, Inc. company employs more people globally than Draycast Foundries Limited company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Draycast Foundries Limited nor X-Cel Technologies, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Draycast Foundries Limited nor X-Cel Technologies, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Draycast Foundries Limited nor X-Cel Technologies, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Draycast Foundries Limited nor X-Cel Technologies, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Draycast Foundries Limited nor X-Cel Technologies, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Draycast Foundries Limited nor X-Cel Technologies, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H