Comparison Overview

Dragonfly Transitions

VS

Central Counties Services

Dragonfly Transitions

901 Main Street, Klamath Falls, 97601, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Dragonfly Transitions is a nine to twelve month program in southern Oregon for young adults. It is designed with progressive phases and a variety of living environments based on student interest and readiness. We work with students to support transition into a healthy young adult life with independence and autonomy through connection and community. Dragonfly offers the opportunity for real world experience while providing a stable, supportive environment where students can flourish. Students can attend college, volunteer, work, and engage in a variety of fitness and recreational activities. The overarching goal is to support students in a sustainable and meaningful life path. No two paths are the same.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Central Counties Services

304 S 22nd St, Temple, 76501, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21

Central Counties Services has served over 70,000 people with mental disabilities since 1967. The Center’s services have fluctuated over time depending funding available. The changing state and federal rules that accompany the Center’s funding have also played a role in determining what services are provided for specified populations in the Center’s five-county catchment area. The activities at the Center tell a story of how the Center was started and continues to meet the complex challenges of the times. Much has been accomplished toward moving the Center from its early caretaker role to being a high quality sophisticated treatment agency that proudly serves the citizens in Bell, Coryell, Hamilton, Lampasas, and Milam counties.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 129
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dragonfly-transitions.jpeg
Dragonfly Transitions
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/central-counties-services.jpeg
Central Counties Services
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Dragonfly Transitions
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Central Counties Services
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dragonfly Transitions in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Central Counties Services in 2026.

Incident History — Dragonfly Transitions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dragonfly Transitions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Central Counties Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Central Counties Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dragonfly-transitions.jpeg
Dragonfly Transitions
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/central-counties-services.jpeg
Central Counties Services
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Central Counties Services company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Dragonfly Transitions company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Central Counties Services company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Dragonfly Transitions company.

In the current year, Central Counties Services company and Dragonfly Transitions company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Central Counties Services company nor Dragonfly Transitions company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Central Counties Services company nor Dragonfly Transitions company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Central Counties Services company nor Dragonfly Transitions company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Dragonfly Transitions company nor Central Counties Services company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Dragonfly Transitions nor Central Counties Services holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Dragonfly Transitions company nor Central Counties Services company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Central Counties Services company employs more people globally than Dragonfly Transitions company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Dragonfly Transitions nor Central Counties Services holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Dragonfly Transitions nor Central Counties Services holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Dragonfly Transitions nor Central Counties Services holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Dragonfly Transitions nor Central Counties Services holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Dragonfly Transitions nor Central Counties Services holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Dragonfly Transitions nor Central Counties Services holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H