Comparison Overview

Dr Print (UK) Ltd

VS

Print Media Association.

Dr Print (UK) Ltd

41 Downing Street, Smethwick, West Midlands, B66 4JE, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Dr Print has been in business since 1976, and our team consists of experienced professionals dedicated to delivering successful Promotional Merchandise for businesses. We understand the need to provide inspiration and creativity, cost effectively in order for clients to realise a true return on investment. Selecting a promotional product for an event is really just only just the beginning of any promotional marketing campaign… Knowing how long it takes to manufacture, whether it can be branded to reflect your brand, and if it’s suitable for the target audience, are just some of the factors we consider when supplying our clients with merchandise. With over 35 years of experience in Lithographic Print and Print Management, we understand print and branding. All of our clients benefit from working with dedicated account managers and our artwork studio, who work closely with companies to understand their business objectives and deliver branded merchandise to suit their marketing requirements.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Print Media Association.

None
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Print Media Association (PMA) formerly Printing Industries of St. Louis (PISTL) is your local St. Louis based nonprofit trade association for the printing and graphic arts industry and its allied industries. PMA membership includes membership in Printing Industries of America (PIA), the world's largest graphic communications trade association, and AAIM Employers Association, a resource rich, local organization dedicated to assisting businesses with H.R. issues.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dr-print-uk-ltd.jpeg
Dr Print (UK) Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Print Media Association.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Dr Print (UK) Ltd
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Print Media Association.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dr Print (UK) Ltd in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Print Media Association. in 2025.

Incident History — Dr Print (UK) Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dr Print (UK) Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Print Media Association. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Print Media Association. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dr-print-uk-ltd.jpeg
Dr Print (UK) Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Print Media Association.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Print Media Association. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Dr Print (UK) Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Print Media Association. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Dr Print (UK) Ltd company.

In the current year, Print Media Association. company and Dr Print (UK) Ltd company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Print Media Association. company nor Dr Print (UK) Ltd company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Print Media Association. company nor Dr Print (UK) Ltd company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Print Media Association. company nor Dr Print (UK) Ltd company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Dr Print (UK) Ltd company nor Print Media Association. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Dr Print (UK) Ltd nor Print Media Association. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Dr Print (UK) Ltd company nor Print Media Association. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Dr Print (UK) Ltd company employs more people globally than Print Media Association. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Dr Print (UK) Ltd nor Print Media Association. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Dr Print (UK) Ltd nor Print Media Association. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Dr Print (UK) Ltd nor Print Media Association. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Dr Print (UK) Ltd nor Print Media Association. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Dr Print (UK) Ltd nor Print Media Association. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Dr Print (UK) Ltd nor Print Media Association. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N