Comparison Overview

Doylestown Historical Society

VS

Florida Museum of Photographic Arts

Doylestown Historical Society

56 S Main St, Doylestown, Pennsylvania, 18901, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://doylestownhistorical.org

"Preserving and celebrating the creative and historic significance of Doylestown and its neighboring communities"​. Collecting and preserving artifacts of our past is a major activity of the Society. But we also collect stories. The narratives are the human connection to our past and it is these stories that help bring history alive. Without the stories, all those photos, documents, and objects are just interesting things to look at. We also celebrate our past with events that commemorate Doylestown's people, places and events, so that they may long be remembered.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Florida Museum of Photographic Arts

1630 E. 7th Avenue, Tampa, 33605, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
http://www.fmopa.org

The Florida Museum of Photographic Arts is a museum dedicated to exhibiting important photographic arts as central to contemporary life and culture. The museum collects, reserves and exhibits historic and contemporary works by nationally and internationally important photographic artists. It also enriches the community by operating outreach programs to educate children and adults. Check out our Photography Classes in Tampa!

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/doylestownhistorical.jpeg
Doylestown Historical Society
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/florida-museum-of-photographic-arts.jpeg
Florida Museum of Photographic Arts
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Doylestown Historical Society
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Florida Museum of Photographic Arts
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Doylestown Historical Society in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Florida Museum of Photographic Arts in 2026.

Incident History — Doylestown Historical Society (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Doylestown Historical Society cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Florida Museum of Photographic Arts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Florida Museum of Photographic Arts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/doylestownhistorical.jpeg
Doylestown Historical Society
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/florida-museum-of-photographic-arts.jpeg
Florida Museum of Photographic Arts
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Doylestown Historical Society company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Florida Museum of Photographic Arts company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Florida Museum of Photographic Arts company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Doylestown Historical Society company.

In the current year, Florida Museum of Photographic Arts company and Doylestown Historical Society company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Florida Museum of Photographic Arts company nor Doylestown Historical Society company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Florida Museum of Photographic Arts company nor Doylestown Historical Society company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Florida Museum of Photographic Arts company nor Doylestown Historical Society company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Doylestown Historical Society company nor Florida Museum of Photographic Arts company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Doylestown Historical Society nor Florida Museum of Photographic Arts holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Doylestown Historical Society company nor Florida Museum of Photographic Arts company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Florida Museum of Photographic Arts company employs more people globally than Doylestown Historical Society company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Doylestown Historical Society nor Florida Museum of Photographic Arts holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Doylestown Historical Society nor Florida Museum of Photographic Arts holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Doylestown Historical Society nor Florida Museum of Photographic Arts holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Doylestown Historical Society nor Florida Museum of Photographic Arts holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Doylestown Historical Society nor Florida Museum of Photographic Arts holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Doylestown Historical Society nor Florida Museum of Photographic Arts holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References