Comparison Overview

DOX Centre for Contemporary Art

VS

Smart Museum of Art, The University of Chicago

DOX Centre for Contemporary Art

None
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.dox.cz

Motto Today, when more and more people tend to think dangerously alike, art’s capacity to suspend, even for a moment, our habitual ways of seeing may be its greatest value. Mission DOX is a non-commercial, independent initiative whose mission is to present contemporary art in the context of issues that shape and are shaped by today‘s world. Objectives To encourage the growth of the local artistic community by facilitating collaboration and partnerships among regional and international artists and institutions. To examine critical issues that cross boundaries between different fields such as architecture, design, sculpture, painting, photography, film and new media. To create an environment for interaction, development and inspiration of different views and opinions. The aim is not only to present exhibitions and works of art, but also to create a dynamic forum for social interaction.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 28
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Smart Museum of Art, The University of Chicago

Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
http://smartmuseum.uchicago.edu/

The Smart Museum of Art at the University of Chicago is a site for rigorous inquiry and exchange that encourages the examination of complex issues through the lens of art objects and artistic practice. Through strong community and scholarly partnerships, the Museum incorporates diverse ideas, identities, and experiences into its exhibitions and collections, academic initiatives, and public programming. The Smart first opened in 1974.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 54
Subsidiaries: 16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dox-centre-for-contemporary-art.jpeg
DOX Centre for Contemporary Art
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/smart-museum-of-art.jpeg
Smart Museum of Art, The University of Chicago
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
DOX Centre for Contemporary Art
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Smart Museum of Art, The University of Chicago
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DOX Centre for Contemporary Art in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Smart Museum of Art, The University of Chicago in 2026.

Incident History — DOX Centre for Contemporary Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DOX Centre for Contemporary Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Smart Museum of Art, The University of Chicago (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Smart Museum of Art, The University of Chicago cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dox-centre-for-contemporary-art.jpeg
DOX Centre for Contemporary Art
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/smart-museum-of-art.jpeg
Smart Museum of Art, The University of Chicago
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

DOX Centre for Contemporary Art company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Smart Museum of Art, The University of Chicago company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Smart Museum of Art, The University of Chicago company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to DOX Centre for Contemporary Art company.

In the current year, Smart Museum of Art, The University of Chicago company and DOX Centre for Contemporary Art company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Smart Museum of Art, The University of Chicago company nor DOX Centre for Contemporary Art company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Smart Museum of Art, The University of Chicago company nor DOX Centre for Contemporary Art company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Smart Museum of Art, The University of Chicago company nor DOX Centre for Contemporary Art company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither DOX Centre for Contemporary Art company nor Smart Museum of Art, The University of Chicago company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither DOX Centre for Contemporary Art nor Smart Museum of Art, The University of Chicago holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Smart Museum of Art, The University of Chicago company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to DOX Centre for Contemporary Art company.

Smart Museum of Art, The University of Chicago company employs more people globally than DOX Centre for Contemporary Art company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither DOX Centre for Contemporary Art nor Smart Museum of Art, The University of Chicago holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither DOX Centre for Contemporary Art nor Smart Museum of Art, The University of Chicago holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither DOX Centre for Contemporary Art nor Smart Museum of Art, The University of Chicago holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither DOX Centre for Contemporary Art nor Smart Museum of Art, The University of Chicago holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither DOX Centre for Contemporary Art nor Smart Museum of Art, The University of Chicago holds HIPAA certification.

Neither DOX Centre for Contemporary Art nor Smart Museum of Art, The University of Chicago holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References