Comparison Overview

DOX Centre for Contemporary Art

VS

London Transport Museum

DOX Centre for Contemporary Art

None
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 800 and 849

Motto Today, when more and more people tend to think dangerously alike, art’s capacity to suspend, even for a moment, our habitual ways of seeing may be its greatest value. Mission DOX is a non-commercial, independent initiative whose mission is to present contemporary art in the context of issues that shape and are shaped by today‘s world. Objectives To encourage the growth of the local artistic community by facilitating collaboration and partnerships among regional and international artists and institutions. To examine critical issues that cross boundaries between different fields such as architecture, design, sculpture, painting, photography, film and new media. To create an environment for interaction, development and inspiration of different views and opinions. The aim is not only to present exhibitions and works of art, but also to create a dynamic forum for social interaction.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 28
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

London Transport Museum

39 Wellington Street , London, Westminster, GB, WC2E 7BB
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

London Transport Museum explores the story of London and its transport system over the last 200 years, highlighting the powerful link between transport and the growth of modern London, culture and society since 1800. We care for over 450,000 items - preserving, researching and acquiring objects to use in our galleries, exhibitions and other activities. As well as exploring the past, the Museum looks at present-day transport developments and concepts for urban transportation in the future, which includes a contemporary collecting policy for the benefit of future generations.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 253
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dox-centre-for-contemporary-art.jpeg
DOX Centre for Contemporary Art
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/london-transport-museum.jpeg
London Transport Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
DOX Centre for Contemporary Art
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
London Transport Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DOX Centre for Contemporary Art in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for London Transport Museum in 2025.

Incident History — DOX Centre for Contemporary Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DOX Centre for Contemporary Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — London Transport Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

London Transport Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dox-centre-for-contemporary-art.jpeg
DOX Centre for Contemporary Art
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/london-transport-museum.jpeg
London Transport Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

DOX Centre for Contemporary Art company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to London Transport Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, London Transport Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to DOX Centre for Contemporary Art company.

In the current year, London Transport Museum company and DOX Centre for Contemporary Art company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither London Transport Museum company nor DOX Centre for Contemporary Art company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither London Transport Museum company nor DOX Centre for Contemporary Art company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither London Transport Museum company nor DOX Centre for Contemporary Art company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither DOX Centre for Contemporary Art company nor London Transport Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither DOX Centre for Contemporary Art nor London Transport Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither DOX Centre for Contemporary Art company nor London Transport Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

London Transport Museum company employs more people globally than DOX Centre for Contemporary Art company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither DOX Centre for Contemporary Art nor London Transport Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither DOX Centre for Contemporary Art nor London Transport Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither DOX Centre for Contemporary Art nor London Transport Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither DOX Centre for Contemporary Art nor London Transport Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither DOX Centre for Contemporary Art nor London Transport Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither DOX Centre for Contemporary Art nor London Transport Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X