Comparison Overview

Douglass P.C.

VS

Voluble: Insights For Litigation

Douglass P.C.

77 W. Wacker Dr., Chicago, Illinois, 60601, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Douglass PC was originally founded in 2011 by Jennifer Ladisch Douglass. In 2020, Richard Douglass and Jennifer Ladisch Douglass joined forces to create a Chicago-based law firm focused on addressing the needs of complex businesses and high net worth individuals throughout the country in matters involving commercial litigation, arbitration, and mediation. Some disputes require large legal teams, but most don’t. Let us show you why.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Voluble: Insights For Litigation

14 Duncan St, Toronto, Ontario, M5H 3GB, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

At Voluble: Insights for Litigation, we work closely with law firms and expert witnesses to mine social media to produce powerful evidence for use in commercial litigation. Our approach provides robust quantitative data and poignant anecdotes derived from major social and online media platforms. We specialize in providing social media analysis to support the following matters: • Intellectual Property • Deceptive Advertising • Defamation Our work has been used in dozens of cases, including in several high-profile matters that led to favorable outcomes for our clients. Some of our recent big wins include • $787.5 million settlement for Dominion Voting Systems in its suit against Fox News • $5M judgment in favor of our client E. Jean Carroll in her defamation suit against former President Donald Trump • $293M judgment in favor of our client Monster Energy in its suit against the maker of the energy drink “Bang Energy” If you have a case where you think social media could be useful, we would be pleased to offer you a free consultation and a preview of our analysis. Contact us at [email protected] for more information.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/douglass-ladisch-douglass-p-c.jpeg
Douglass P.C.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/voluble-insights-for-litigation.jpeg
Voluble: Insights For Litigation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Douglass P.C.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Voluble: Insights For Litigation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Douglass P.C. in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Voluble: Insights For Litigation in 2025.

Incident History — Douglass P.C. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Douglass P.C. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Voluble: Insights For Litigation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Voluble: Insights For Litigation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/douglass-ladisch-douglass-p-c.jpeg
Douglass P.C.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/voluble-insights-for-litigation.jpeg
Voluble: Insights For Litigation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Douglass P.C. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Voluble: Insights For Litigation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Voluble: Insights For Litigation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Douglass P.C. company.

In the current year, Voluble: Insights For Litigation company and Douglass P.C. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Voluble: Insights For Litigation company nor Douglass P.C. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Voluble: Insights For Litigation company nor Douglass P.C. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Voluble: Insights For Litigation company nor Douglass P.C. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Douglass P.C. company nor Voluble: Insights For Litigation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Douglass P.C. nor Voluble: Insights For Litigation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Douglass P.C. company nor Voluble: Insights For Litigation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Voluble: Insights For Litigation company employs more people globally than Douglass P.C. company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Douglass P.C. nor Voluble: Insights For Litigation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Douglass P.C. nor Voluble: Insights For Litigation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Douglass P.C. nor Voluble: Insights For Litigation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Douglass P.C. nor Voluble: Insights For Litigation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Douglass P.C. nor Voluble: Insights For Litigation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Douglass P.C. nor Voluble: Insights For Litigation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X