Comparison Overview

DotLib

VS

Pacific Magazines

DotLib

Avenida Ayrton Senna, 2600, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 22775-003, BR
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.dotlib.com

A Dot.Lib é uma empresa brasileira dedicada à disseminação da informação científica através do fornecimento de acesso online a livros digitais, periódicos eletrônicos e bases de dados nas principais áreas do conhecimento: Ciências Agrárias, Ciências Biológicas, Ciências da Saúde, Ciências Exatas e da Terra, Ciências Humanas, Ciências Sociais Aplicadas, Engenharias e Artes.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 52
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Pacific Magazines

AU
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 800 and 849
http://www.pacificmags.com.au

Pacific Magazines, part of the Seven West Media Group, is one of Australia’s most innovative audience companies. With a growing portfolio spanning print, digital, social and events, Pacific Magazines delivers quality content that engages consumers in whatever environment it is delivered in. Across its multi-platform portfolio Pacific Magazines’ total monthly brand impressions now sits at 22.7million per month. Portfolio highlights include - Australia’s most powerful multimedia brand, Better Homes & Gardens; Three of the top five biggest magazine brands in the country (Better Homes & Gardens, New Idea & that’s life!); 5 of the top 10 largest Facebook communities in Australia in the News and Media category (#2 Men’s Health, #3 Girlfriend, #4 Bride To Be, #5 Practical Parenting and #7 New Idea) Pacific Magazines’ broad reach and intimate understanding of our audience uniquely places us to seamlessly create strategic cross platform campaigns that deliver results for our partners.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 176
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dotlib.jpeg
DotLib
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pacific-magazines.jpeg
Pacific Magazines
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
DotLib
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Pacific Magazines
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DotLib in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pacific Magazines in 2025.

Incident History — DotLib (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DotLib cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Pacific Magazines (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pacific Magazines cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dotlib.jpeg
DotLib
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pacific-magazines.jpeg
Pacific Magazines
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Pacific Magazines company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to DotLib company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Pacific Magazines company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to DotLib company.

In the current year, Pacific Magazines company and DotLib company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Pacific Magazines company nor DotLib company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Pacific Magazines company nor DotLib company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Pacific Magazines company nor DotLib company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither DotLib company nor Pacific Magazines company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither DotLib nor Pacific Magazines holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Both Pacific Magazines company and DotLib company have a similar number of subsidiaries worldwide.

Pacific Magazines company employs more people globally than DotLib company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither DotLib nor Pacific Magazines holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither DotLib nor Pacific Magazines holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither DotLib nor Pacific Magazines holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither DotLib nor Pacific Magazines holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither DotLib nor Pacific Magazines holds HIPAA certification.

Neither DotLib nor Pacific Magazines holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References