Comparison Overview

dot art

VS

Asheville Art Museum

dot art

02124, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.dotart.org

Our mission is to make exemplary visual arts education available to everyone in Dorchester, Massachusetts, and surrounding neighborhoods. dot art provides classes and other programs to between 1200 and 1300 participants each year; designs and implements collaborative programs with museums, schools, and health-care providers; and mounts exhibitions and events that are viewed by thousands and documented by Boston media.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Asheville Art Museum

2 S. Pack Square, Asheville, 28802-1717, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ashevilleart.org

Founded by artists in 1948 in Asheville, NC, the Asheville Art Museum annually presents an exciting, inviting and active schedule of exhibitions and public programs based on its Permanent Collection of 20th and 21st century American art. Any visit will also include experiences with works of significance to Western North Carolina’s cultural heritage including Studio Craft, Black Mountain College and Cherokee artists. Special exhibitions feature renowned regional and national artists and explore issues of enduring interest. The Museum also offers a wide array of innovative and entertaining educational programs for audiences of all ages.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
dot art
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/asheville-art-museum.jpeg
Asheville Art Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
dot art
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Asheville Art Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for dot art in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Asheville Art Museum in 2026.

Incident History — dot art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

dot art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Asheville Art Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Asheville Art Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
dot art
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/asheville-art-museum.jpeg
Asheville Art Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

dot art company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Asheville Art Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Asheville Art Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to dot art company.

In the current year, Asheville Art Museum company and dot art company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Asheville Art Museum company nor dot art company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Asheville Art Museum company nor dot art company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Asheville Art Museum company nor dot art company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither dot art company nor Asheville Art Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither dot art nor Asheville Art Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither dot art company nor Asheville Art Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Asheville Art Museum company employs more people globally than dot art company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither dot art nor Asheville Art Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither dot art nor Asheville Art Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither dot art nor Asheville Art Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither dot art nor Asheville Art Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither dot art nor Asheville Art Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither dot art nor Asheville Art Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References