Comparison Overview

Dorset Mind

VS

ReMend Non-Profit Organization

Dorset Mind

20-22 Wellington Road, Bournemouth, Dorset BH8 8JN, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799

Dorset Mind charity has over 75 years' experience supporting Dorset’s mental health. They connect and change minds, working in partnerships that bring people together to make genuine change within their communities. They speak out to ensure Dorset is inclusive and deliver life-changing support that inspires people to live mentally healthy. Their 1-2-1 and group services for adults and young people includes active monitoring, counselling, mentoring, wellbeing support groups, and alternative social prescription solutions that all prevent mental health worsening and aid recovery. Their expert training team delivers transformational education and training packages for businesses and workplaces across Dorset. Varied volunteer opportunities are available throughout the charity. Dorset Mind works in partnership with local decision makers and influential organisations to encourage social inclusion and improve mental health services to meet the rising demands of our communities. Visit: dorsetmind.uk.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 51
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

ReMend Non-Profit Organization

8010 Frost Street, San Diego, CA, 92123, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

ReMend is committed to providing no-cost mentoring, encouragement and guidance to those affected by kidney disease, their families and others involved in their care and treatment. Our mentors have undergone dialysis, successful kidney transplants or kidney donations – we are trusted sources of information based on our own personal experiences. Our dedicated and trained volunteers are from all over San Diego County and are available by phone or an online conference service. Mentors are here to listen, provide encouragement and share success stories. ReMend mentors can be the face of hope for anyone facing dialysis or a kidney transplant. We’re here to listen and provide encouragement, and most importantly, share our experiences. We are living proof that life does not end with kidney disease. Whether someone is facing Chronic kidney disease (CKD), dialysis, possible kidney donation or a kidney transplant, the ReMend program empowers patients to move forward with their lives after being diagnosed with kidney disease. Support from friends, family and the renal care team is important, but talking to someone who has been in the same situation is often the best for calming nerves and realizing positive outcomes.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dorset-mind.jpeg
Dorset Mind
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/remend-non-profit-organization.jpeg
ReMend Non-Profit Organization
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Dorset Mind
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ReMend Non-Profit Organization
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dorset Mind in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ReMend Non-Profit Organization in 2026.

Incident History — Dorset Mind (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dorset Mind cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ReMend Non-Profit Organization (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ReMend Non-Profit Organization cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dorset-mind.jpeg
Dorset Mind
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/remend-non-profit-organization.jpeg
ReMend Non-Profit Organization
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Dorset Mind company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ReMend Non-Profit Organization company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, ReMend Non-Profit Organization company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Dorset Mind company.

In the current year, ReMend Non-Profit Organization company and Dorset Mind company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ReMend Non-Profit Organization company nor Dorset Mind company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ReMend Non-Profit Organization company nor Dorset Mind company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ReMend Non-Profit Organization company nor Dorset Mind company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Dorset Mind company nor ReMend Non-Profit Organization company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Dorset Mind nor ReMend Non-Profit Organization holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Dorset Mind company nor ReMend Non-Profit Organization company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Dorset Mind company employs more people globally than ReMend Non-Profit Organization company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Dorset Mind nor ReMend Non-Profit Organization holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Dorset Mind nor ReMend Non-Profit Organization holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Dorset Mind nor ReMend Non-Profit Organization holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Dorset Mind nor ReMend Non-Profit Organization holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Dorset Mind nor ReMend Non-Profit Organization holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Dorset Mind nor ReMend Non-Profit Organization holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N