Comparison Overview

DoorDash for Business

VS

NetEase

DoorDash for Business

303 2nd St, San Francisco, 94107, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://business.doordash.com/

DoorDash for Business, a product of DoorDash, specializes in end-to-end delivery for every corporate food need. Our fast and easy meal program provides unparalleled service and quality for all sizes of companies and all types of occasions. This page is not being monitored for Help & Support requests. For all requests, please visit: https://help.doordash.com/business/s/work-support?language=en_US

NAICS: 513
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 79
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
9
Attack type number
2
View Profile

NetEase

No.599 Wangshang Road, Binjiang District, Hangzhou, 310052, CN
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 800 and 849
https://ir.netease.com/

As a leading internet technology company based in China, NetEase, Inc. (NASDAQ: NTES and HKEX:9999, "NetEase") provides premium online services centered around content creation. With extensive offerings across its expanding gaming ecosystem, NetEase develops and operates some of China's most popular and longest running mobile and PC games. Powered by industry-leading inhouse R&D capabilities in China and globally, NetEase creates superior gaming experiences, inspires players and passionately delivers value for its thriving community worldwide. Beyond games, NetEase service offerings include its majority-controlled subsidiaries Youdao (NYSE:DAO), China's leading technology-focused intelligent learning company, and Cloud Music (HKEX:9899), China's leading online music content community, as well as Yanxuan, NetEase's private label consumer lifestyle brand.

NAICS: 513
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 11,962
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/doordash-for-business.jpeg
DoorDash for Business
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/netease.jpeg
NetEase
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
DoorDash for Business
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
NetEase
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DoorDash for Business in 2026.

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NetEase in 2026.

Incident History — DoorDash for Business (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DoorDash for Business cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — NetEase (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NetEase cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/doordash-for-business.jpeg
DoorDash for Business
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Third-Party Vendor Compromise, Credential Theft, Social Engineering
Motivation: Data Theft, Potential Fraud Enablement
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Social Engineering (Employee Targeted)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Social Engineering, Phishing (Spear Phishing/Vishing), Compromised Credentials
Motivation: Data Theft for Follow-on Attacks (e.g., Spear Phishing, Vishing), Potential Financial Gain via Stolen Data
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/netease.jpeg
NetEase
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

NetEase company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to DoorDash for Business company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

DoorDash for Business company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas NetEase company has not reported any.

In the current year, NetEase company and DoorDash for Business company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither NetEase company nor DoorDash for Business company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

DoorDash for Business company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other NetEase company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither NetEase company nor DoorDash for Business company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

DoorDash for Business company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while NetEase company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither DoorDash for Business nor NetEase holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

NetEase company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to DoorDash for Business company.

NetEase company employs more people globally than DoorDash for Business company, reflecting its scale as a Technology, Information and Internet.

Neither DoorDash for Business nor NetEase holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither DoorDash for Business nor NetEase holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither DoorDash for Business nor NetEase holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither DoorDash for Business nor NetEase holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither DoorDash for Business nor NetEase holds HIPAA certification.

Neither DoorDash for Business nor NetEase holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References