Comparison Overview

Door to Door Storage, Inc.

VS

Dynamic 3PL

Door to Door Storage, Inc.

20425 72nd Avenue South, Ste 200, Kent, WA, 98032, US
Last Update: 2025-12-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.doortodoor.com

Our Story In 1996, Door to Door revolutionized the self-storage industry by introducing portable, containerized storage in Seattle, Washington. The idea caught on quickly on the West Coast, and today Door to Door serves numerous metropolitan areas across the nation. In 1999, we took the logical next step and began offering self-service moving to our customers with the same commitment to exceeding their expectations. Today, Door to Door’s corporate headquarters is located 20 miles south of Seattle in Kent, Washington. Some companies have chosen to copy our product as closely as possible, while others claim that they have a better container. In either case, they all struggle to match our industry leading customer satisfaction ratings and enviable record of protecting possessions. We are committed to delivering quality moving and storage solutions as well as the kind of Exceptional Customer Care you will recommend to your friends and family. Through all of your life transitions, we’ll be here to take care of you.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 63
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Dynamic 3PL

4100 Rock Creek Blvd, Joliet, 60431, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://Dynamic3PL.com

Dynamic 3PL provides the full range of warehousing and transportation management services with a focus on cost-effective and value-added solutions to meet your more complex logistics needs. We use the latest technology to assure orders are processed efficiently and to provide you with real-time access to critical data and confirmations. Warehousing, Retail Fulfillment, e-commerce Fulfillment, Primary Packaging, Secondary Packaging, and Transportation Management – all under one roof.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/door-to-door-storage.jpeg
Door to Door Storage, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dynamic-3pl.jpeg
Dynamic 3PL
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Door to Door Storage, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Dynamic 3PL
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Warehousing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Door to Door Storage, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Warehousing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dynamic 3PL in 2025.

Incident History — Door to Door Storage, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Door to Door Storage, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Dynamic 3PL (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dynamic 3PL cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/door-to-door-storage.jpeg
Door to Door Storage, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dynamic-3pl.jpeg
Dynamic 3PL
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Door to Door Storage, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Dynamic 3PL company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Dynamic 3PL company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Door to Door Storage, Inc. company.

In the current year, Dynamic 3PL company and Door to Door Storage, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Dynamic 3PL company nor Door to Door Storage, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Dynamic 3PL company nor Door to Door Storage, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Dynamic 3PL company nor Door to Door Storage, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Door to Door Storage, Inc. company nor Dynamic 3PL company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Door to Door Storage, Inc. nor Dynamic 3PL holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Door to Door Storage, Inc. company nor Dynamic 3PL company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Door to Door Storage, Inc. company employs more people globally than Dynamic 3PL company, reflecting its scale as a Warehousing.

Neither Door to Door Storage, Inc. nor Dynamic 3PL holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Door to Door Storage, Inc. nor Dynamic 3PL holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Door to Door Storage, Inc. nor Dynamic 3PL holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Door to Door Storage, Inc. nor Dynamic 3PL holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Door to Door Storage, Inc. nor Dynamic 3PL holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Door to Door Storage, Inc. nor Dynamic 3PL holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
References
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
References
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References