Comparison Overview

Door Controls USA

VS

Applied Automation (UK) Ltd

Door Controls USA

321 VZCR 4500, None, Ben Wheeler, Texas, US, 75754
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Providing products that are available, reliable, and economical. Door Controls USA, offers the widest range of products in the automatic door industry. It does not make any difference which door brand, Door Controls USA has it. Before any door part is added to our extensive inventory, Door Controls USA's quality control department tests and inspects all products to meet our high standards. We offer commercial automatic and manual door parts. With our vast line of commercial hardware and parts, Door Controls USA is your one-stop-shop for all your automatic and manual door part needs. Our parts department is open from 7:00 a.m to 5:00 p.m. CST (M-F).

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 187
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Applied Automation (UK) Ltd

Eastern Wood Road, Plymouth, Devon, PL7 5ET, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Applied Automation (UK) Ltd specialises in automation and control solutions, systems and products for manufacturing, the marine sector and smart homes. Customisation is at the heart of our business, we are customer focused and proud of our reputation for good service. The company has seven divisions with specialist teams in industrial engineering solutions, materials handling and factory systems, the technical distribution of industrial control and automation products, marine controls for luxury yachts, home automation, graphics and IT. We have two large manufacturing facilities and offices in Plymouth and a warehouse and distribution facility in Cardiff.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 84
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/door-controls-usa.jpeg
Door Controls USA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/applied-automation-uk-ltd.jpeg
Applied Automation (UK) Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Door Controls USA
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Applied Automation (UK) Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Door Controls USA in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Applied Automation (UK) Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — Door Controls USA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Door Controls USA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Applied Automation (UK) Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Applied Automation (UK) Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/door-controls-usa.jpeg
Door Controls USA
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/applied-automation-uk-ltd.jpeg
Applied Automation (UK) Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Door Controls USA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Applied Automation (UK) Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Applied Automation (UK) Ltd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Door Controls USA company.

In the current year, Applied Automation (UK) Ltd company and Door Controls USA company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Applied Automation (UK) Ltd company nor Door Controls USA company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Applied Automation (UK) Ltd company nor Door Controls USA company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Applied Automation (UK) Ltd company nor Door Controls USA company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Door Controls USA company nor Applied Automation (UK) Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Door Controls USA nor Applied Automation (UK) Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Door Controls USA company nor Applied Automation (UK) Ltd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Door Controls USA company employs more people globally than Applied Automation (UK) Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Door Controls USA nor Applied Automation (UK) Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Door Controls USA nor Applied Automation (UK) Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Door Controls USA nor Applied Automation (UK) Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Door Controls USA nor Applied Automation (UK) Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Door Controls USA nor Applied Automation (UK) Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Door Controls USA nor Applied Automation (UK) Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H