Comparison Overview

Doma

VS

Keller Williams Realty, LLC

Doma

undefined, San Francisco, CA, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-03-16 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

Doma is making title and escrow a simpler, seamless process for lenders, agents and homebuyers across the country. We build transformative technology driven by our passion to improve the customer experience.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2,121
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Keller Williams Realty, LLC

Suite 400, None, Austin, TX, US, 78746
Last Update: 2025-09-05 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

Austin, Texas-based Keller Williams, the worldโ€™s largest real estate franchise by agent count, has more than 1,100 offices and 176,000 agents. The franchise is also No. 1 in units and sales volume in the United States. Since 1983, the company has cultivated an agent-centric, technology-driven, and education-based culture that rewards agents as stakeholders. For more information, visit headquarters.kw.com.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 109,741
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/domahq.jpeg
Doma
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/keller-williams-realty-llc.jpeg
Keller Williams Realty, LLC
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Doma
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Keller Williams Realty, LLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Doma in 2025.

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Keller Williams Realty, LLC in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Doma (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Doma cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Keller Williams Realty, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Keller Williams Realty, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/domahq.jpeg
Doma
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/keller-williams-realty-llc.jpeg
Keller Williams Realty, LLC
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2017
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both Doma company and Keller Williams Realty, LLC company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Keller Williams Realty, LLC company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Doma company has not reported any.

In the current year, Keller Williams Realty, LLC company and Doma company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Keller Williams Realty, LLC company nor Doma company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Keller Williams Realty, LLC company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Doma company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Keller Williams Realty, LLC company nor Doma company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Doma company nor Keller Williams Realty, LLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Doma company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Keller Williams Realty, LLC company.

Keller Williams Realty, LLC company employs more people globally than Doma company, reflecting its scale as a Real Estate.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Quadient DS-700 iQ devices through 2025-09-30 might have a race condition during the quick clicking of (in order) the Question Mark button, the Help Button, the About button, and the Help Button, leading to a transition out of kiosk mode into local administrative access. NOTE: the reporter indicates that the "behavior was observed sporadically" during "limited time on the client site," making it not "possible to gain more information about the specific kiosk mode crashing issue," and the only conclusion was "there appears to be some form of race condition." Accordingly, there can be doubt that a reproducible cybersecurity vulnerability was identified; sporadic software crashes can also be caused by a hardware fault on a single device (for example, transient RAM errors). The reporter also describes a variety of other issues, including initial access via USB because of the absence of a "lock-pick resistant locking solution for the External Controller PC cabinet," which is not a cybersecurity vulnerability (section 4.1.5 of the CNA Operational Rules). Finally, it is unclear whether the device or OS configuration was inappropriate, given that the risks are typically limited to insider threats within the mail operations room of a large company.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Argo CD is a declarative, GitOps continuous delivery tool for Kubernetes. Versions between 2.1.0 and 2.14.19, 3.2.0-rc1, 3.1.0-rc1 through 3.1.7, and 3.0.0-rc1 through 3.0.18 contain a race condition in the repository credentials handler that can cause the Argo CD server to panic and crash when concurrent operations are performed on the same repository URL. The vulnerability is located in numerous repository related handlers in the util/db/repository_secrets.go file. A valid API token with repositories resource permissions (create, update, or delete actions) is required to trigger the race condition. This vulnerability causes the entire Argo CD server to crash and become unavailable. Attackers can repeatedly and continuously trigger the race condition to maintain a denial-of-service state, disrupting all GitOps operations. This issue is fixed in versions 2.14.20, 3.2.0-rc2, 3.1.8 and 3.0.19.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Web Content translation in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.112, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.8, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.10, 7.4 GA through update 92, and older unsupported versions allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via any rich text field in a web content article.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Keysight Ixia Vision has an issue with hardcoded cryptographic material which may allow an attacker to intercept or decrypt payloads sent to the device via API calls or user authentication if the end user does not replace the TLS certificate that shipped with the device. Remediation is available in Version 6.9.1, released on September 23, 2025.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) in the /dashboard/notes endpoint of Syaqui Collegetivity v1.0.0 allows attackers to impersonate other users and perform arbitrary operations via a crafted POST request.