Comparison Overview

Dolmans Solicitors

VS

EDGE Litigation Consulting, LLC

Dolmans Solicitors

Capital Tower, Cardiff, undefined, CF10 3AG, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

We work in partnership with our clients to help them achieve their aims and objectives. Our clients find us approachable and committed to helping them in the most cost-effective way possible. We conduct our specialist work with local authorities, public bodies and prominent insurers from our base in Cardiff and we have a reputation in the business world for our commercial vision and our pragmatic approach to the delivery of legal services. Our private clients receive high standards of personal care and professional ability. Our Vision We are passionate about creating a mutually rewarding partnership with our clients by pro-actively understanding their needs. We offer incisive, timely, cost-effective solutions which support the goals and aspirations of our clients. We remain committed to supporting and assisting the development of the economy of Wales whilst the provision of our services now extends throughout the United Kingdom. ​History of Dolmans Solicitors ​We can trace our roots back to 1812 when Edward Dolman set up a practice in Clifford's Inn. Our presence in South Wales dates from 1893 when Cardiff and its hinterland were enjoying prosperity from the coal and steel industries. Our reputation was enhanced by Eric Dolman, who became Lord Mayor of Cardiff in 1967, and by Arthur Dolman, who was Mayor of Newport and a founder of Newport's Dolman Theatre. Until 1970, the practice had offices in Cardiff, Newport and Bristol, but these offices then separated, with only the Cardiff practice continuing to operate as Dolmans. In February 2011, Dolmans relocated from its Windsor Place location, from where it had traded for over 30 years, to a location at One Kingsway and more recently, in June 2018, the practice moved ‘over the road’ to its current location at Capital Tower, Greyfriars Road in the centre of Cardiff.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 31
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

EDGE Litigation Consulting, LLC

Providence, 02905, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

EDGE began because its partners had a different vision for what a trial consulting firm could be. We noticed that the trial consulting field was increasingly divided into dozens of tiny firms, each of which had one senior consultant and several junior consultants (the so-called “guru plus the help” model). Larger trial consulting firms had more senior consultants, but these firms were often set up so that these consultants worked alone, rarely collaborating with other senior-level consultants. We started EDGE because we believed clients would benefit from a team of senior-level consultants working for a firm that actively encouraged collaboration on cases. At EDGE, there are no junior consultants, and EDGE is intentionally set up so partners collaborate on cases. Our clients get a senior point person and a senior team, a benefit we believe is unique in the trial consulting industry. When our clients hire a major accounting or management consulting firm, they expect (and get) a collaborative team of senior-level people. We believe it is time for this collaborative team model to come to the trial consulting field. Our partners are consultants and social scientists who are experts in the study of human behavior and group decision-making. Beth Wilson Devlin, Patricia Hastings and Jennifer Keeney each have over 25 years of experience.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dolmans-solicitors.jpeg
Dolmans Solicitors
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/edge-litigation-consulting-llc.jpeg
EDGE Litigation Consulting, LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Dolmans Solicitors
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
EDGE Litigation Consulting, LLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dolmans Solicitors in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EDGE Litigation Consulting, LLC in 2025.

Incident History — Dolmans Solicitors (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dolmans Solicitors cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — EDGE Litigation Consulting, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EDGE Litigation Consulting, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dolmans-solicitors.jpeg
Dolmans Solicitors
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/edge-litigation-consulting-llc.jpeg
EDGE Litigation Consulting, LLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Dolmans Solicitors company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to EDGE Litigation Consulting, LLC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, EDGE Litigation Consulting, LLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Dolmans Solicitors company.

In the current year, EDGE Litigation Consulting, LLC company and Dolmans Solicitors company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither EDGE Litigation Consulting, LLC company nor Dolmans Solicitors company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither EDGE Litigation Consulting, LLC company nor Dolmans Solicitors company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither EDGE Litigation Consulting, LLC company nor Dolmans Solicitors company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Dolmans Solicitors company nor EDGE Litigation Consulting, LLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Dolmans Solicitors nor EDGE Litigation Consulting, LLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Dolmans Solicitors company nor EDGE Litigation Consulting, LLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Dolmans Solicitors company employs more people globally than EDGE Litigation Consulting, LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Dolmans Solicitors nor EDGE Litigation Consulting, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Dolmans Solicitors nor EDGE Litigation Consulting, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Dolmans Solicitors nor EDGE Litigation Consulting, LLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Dolmans Solicitors nor EDGE Litigation Consulting, LLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Dolmans Solicitors nor EDGE Litigation Consulting, LLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Dolmans Solicitors nor EDGE Litigation Consulting, LLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X