Comparison Overview

Dolce Printing

VS

Mimeo

Dolce Printing

29 Brook Avenue, Maywood, 07607, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Since 1984, Dolce Printing, Inc. has been supplying the New York City Metropolitan area with superior printing and excellent customer service. A company founded by two ambitious brothers with the goal to succeed, Dolce Printing has emerged as one of the premier commercial printers in the Tri-State Area. Our client list includes such major corporations as AT&T and Sony while also providing printing to other smaller clientele such as advertising agencies, manufacturers and publishers. Dolce Printing is fully FSC chain-of-custody certified by Smartwood and the Rainforest Alliance. Please visit us at www.dolceprint.com.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Mimeo

undefined, New York, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Print Better. The minds, makers, and innovators at Mimeo are dedicated to giving back customers what matters most - their time. Mimeo provides the fastest, easiest, most reliable way to manage and distribute their content. Mimeo brings customers’ content to life through print and digital formats via its enterprise app suite and global print production facilities. Founded in 1999 as a startup, Mimeo has grown into a global organization, distributing content to customers in over 140 countries.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 633
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dolce-printing.jpeg
Dolce Printing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mimeo.com.jpeg
Mimeo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Dolce Printing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mimeo
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dolce Printing in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mimeo in 2025.

Incident History — Dolce Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dolce Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Mimeo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mimeo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dolce-printing.jpeg
Dolce Printing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mimeo.com.jpeg
Mimeo
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Mimeo company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Dolce Printing company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Mimeo company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Dolce Printing company.

In the current year, Mimeo company and Dolce Printing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Mimeo company nor Dolce Printing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Mimeo company nor Dolce Printing company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Mimeo company nor Dolce Printing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Dolce Printing company nor Mimeo company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Dolce Printing nor Mimeo holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Dolce Printing company nor Mimeo company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Mimeo company employs more people globally than Dolce Printing company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Dolce Printing nor Mimeo holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Dolce Printing nor Mimeo holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Dolce Printing nor Mimeo holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Dolce Printing nor Mimeo holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Dolce Printing nor Mimeo holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Dolce Printing nor Mimeo holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N