Comparison Overview

Dolce Printing

VS

Lamson Paragon Pty Ltd

Dolce Printing

29 Brook Avenue, Maywood, 07607, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Since 1984, Dolce Printing, Inc. has been supplying the New York City Metropolitan area with superior printing and excellent customer service. A company founded by two ambitious brothers with the goal to succeed, Dolce Printing has emerged as one of the premier commercial printers in the Tri-State Area. Our client list includes such major corporations as AT&T and Sony while also providing printing to other smaller clientele such as advertising agencies, manufacturers and publishers. Dolce Printing is fully FSC chain-of-custody certified by Smartwood and the Rainforest Alliance. Please visit us at www.dolceprint.com.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Lamson Paragon Pty Ltd

2-8 Marjorie St, Sefton, NSW, 2162, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-17

The Lamson Paragon Group of companies is comprised of Lamson Paragon, Paper Rolls Australia, Cheque-Mates, Docuspace and Fairplay Print. With a long and successful history in the print and communication industries and with distribution capabilities Australia wide, the Group can accommodate and provide an extensive range of products and services for a multitude of businesses ad commercial operations Lamson Paragon is an industry leader in business form printing and has been in operation for over 20 years. Long standing expertise along with first class customer service enables Lamson Paragon to combine proven printing processes with quality and service that will help you help your customers.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dolce-printing.jpeg
Dolce Printing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lamson-paragon-group-of-companies.jpeg
Lamson Paragon Pty Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Dolce Printing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lamson Paragon Pty Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dolce Printing in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lamson Paragon Pty Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — Dolce Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dolce Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lamson Paragon Pty Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lamson Paragon Pty Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dolce-printing.jpeg
Dolce Printing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lamson-paragon-group-of-companies.jpeg
Lamson Paragon Pty Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lamson Paragon Pty Ltd company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Dolce Printing company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Lamson Paragon Pty Ltd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Dolce Printing company.

In the current year, Lamson Paragon Pty Ltd company and Dolce Printing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lamson Paragon Pty Ltd company nor Dolce Printing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lamson Paragon Pty Ltd company nor Dolce Printing company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lamson Paragon Pty Ltd company nor Dolce Printing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Dolce Printing company nor Lamson Paragon Pty Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Dolce Printing nor Lamson Paragon Pty Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Dolce Printing company nor Lamson Paragon Pty Ltd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Dolce Printing company employs more people globally than Lamson Paragon Pty Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Dolce Printing nor Lamson Paragon Pty Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Dolce Printing nor Lamson Paragon Pty Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Dolce Printing nor Lamson Paragon Pty Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Dolce Printing nor Lamson Paragon Pty Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Dolce Printing nor Lamson Paragon Pty Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Dolce Printing nor Lamson Paragon Pty Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L