Comparison Overview

Department of Health (Philippines)

VS

I work for NSW

Department of Health (Philippines)

San Lazaro Compound, Rizal Avenue, Santa Cruz, Manila City, 1014, PH
Last Update: 2026-01-18
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.doh.gov.ph/

The Philippine Department of Health (abbreviated as DOH; Filipino: Kagawaran ng Kalusugan) is the executive department of the Philippine government responsible for ensuring access to basic public health services by all Filipinos through the provision of quality health care and the regulation of all health services and products. It is the government's over-all technical authority on health. It has its headquarters at the San Lazaro Compound, along Rizal Avenue in Manila. The department is led by the Secretary of Health, nominated by the President of the Philippines and confirmed by the Commission on Appointments. The Secretary is a member of the Cabinet. The current Secretary of Health is Francisco Duque.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 35,478
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

I work for NSW

Sydney, 2000, AU
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799
http://iworkfor.nsw.gov.au/

The NSW public sector includes ten departments and many agencies and organisations working together to develop policy and deliver important services such as health, education, housing, transport and infrastructure across NSW. We are over 300,000 dedicated people who share the same values - making a difference, giving back and responding to the future. Read our community guidelines: bit.ly/PD-community-guidelines

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 63,341
Subsidiaries: 17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
4

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dohgovph.jpeg
Department of Health (Philippines)
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nsw-government.jpeg
I work for NSW
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Department of Health (Philippines)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
I work for NSW
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Department of Health (Philippines) in 2026.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for I work for NSW in 2026.

Incident History — Department of Health (Philippines) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Department of Health (Philippines) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — I work for NSW (X = Date, Y = Severity)

I work for NSW cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dohgovph.jpeg
Department of Health (Philippines)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nsw-government.jpeg
I work for NSW
Incidents

Date Detected: 02/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Accidental Exposure
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 07/2021
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 2/2021
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: financial gain, data exfiltration
Blog: Blog

FAQ

I work for NSW company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Department of Health (Philippines) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

I work for NSW company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Department of Health (Philippines) company has not reported any.

In the current year, I work for NSW company and Department of Health (Philippines) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

I work for NSW company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Department of Health (Philippines) company has not reported such incidents publicly.

I work for NSW company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Department of Health (Philippines) company has not reported such incidents publicly.

I work for NSW company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Department of Health (Philippines) company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Department of Health (Philippines) company nor I work for NSW company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Department of Health (Philippines) nor I work for NSW holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

I work for NSW company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Department of Health (Philippines) company.

I work for NSW company employs more people globally than Department of Health (Philippines) company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither Department of Health (Philippines) nor I work for NSW holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Department of Health (Philippines) nor I work for NSW holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Department of Health (Philippines) nor I work for NSW holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Department of Health (Philippines) nor I work for NSW holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Department of Health (Philippines) nor I work for NSW holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Department of Health (Philippines) nor I work for NSW holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References