Comparison Overview

Doctors Imaging Group

VS

UT Southwestern Medical Center

Doctors Imaging Group

6716 NW 11th Pl, Gainesville, 32605, US
Last Update: 2026-01-20
View Profile
Between 550 and 599
https://www.doctorsimaginggroup.com

With specialties ranging from 3D mammography to minimally invasive interventional treatments, our board certified radiologists work closely with referring physicians to better understand your needs and are committed to delivering a patient-centered experience. Doctors Imaging Group is a physician-owned radiology practice with outpatient imaging centers in Palatka and Gainesville, Florida. Our radiologists are also on the medical staff and provide coverage for North Florida Regional Medical Center and Lake City Medical Center Radiology Departments.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 67
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2
View Profile

UT Southwestern Medical Center

5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, Texas, US, 75390
Last Update: 2026-01-24
Between 750 and 799
https://http://www.utsouthwestern.edu/

UT Southwestern is an academic medical center, world-renowned for its research, regarded among the best in the country for medical education and for clinical and scientific training, and nationally recognized for the quality of care its faculty provides to patients at UT Southwestern’s University Hospital & Clinics and affiliated institutions. The Medical Center includes three degree-granting institutions: UT Southwestern Medical School, UT Southwestern Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, and UT Southwestern School of Health Professions. - The schools train nearly 3,700 medical, graduate, and health profession students, residents, and postdoctoral fellows each year. - Ongoing support from federal agencies, along with foundations, individuals, and corporations, provides more than $524 million per year to fund faculty research. - UT Southwestern physicians provide care in about 80 specialties to more than 117,000 hospitalized patients, more than 360,000 emergency room cases, and oversee nearly 3 million outpatient visits a year. - UT Southwestern has approximately 25,000 employees and an operating budget of $3.7 billion. - UT Southwestern is the #1 hospital in Dallas-Fort Worth for the ninth year in a row, according to U.S. News & World Report. In addition, 12 of our specialties are nationally ranked for 2025-2026 – the most of any hospital in Texas. Those specialties include: Cancer; Cardiology, Heart & Vascular Surgery; Diabetes & Endocrinology; Gastroenterology & GI Surgery; Geriatrics; Neurology & Neurosurgery; Obstetrics & Gynecology; Orthopedics; Otolaryngology – Ear, Nose & Throat; Pulmonology & Lung Surgery; Rehabilitation; and Urology.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 18,662
Subsidiaries: 13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/doctors-imaging-group.jpeg
Doctors Imaging Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/utsw.jpeg
UT Southwestern Medical Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Doctors Imaging Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
UT Southwestern Medical Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Doctors Imaging Group in 2026.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UT Southwestern Medical Center in 2026.

Incident History — Doctors Imaging Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Doctors Imaging Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — UT Southwestern Medical Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UT Southwestern Medical Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/doctors-imaging-group.jpeg
Doctors Imaging Group
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2024
Type:Cyber Attack
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Theft for Resale
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: phishing, AI-generated deepfakes, stolen personal data, cryptocurrency extortion
Motivation: financial gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/utsw.jpeg
UT Southwestern Medical Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

UT Southwestern Medical Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Doctors Imaging Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Doctors Imaging Group company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas UT Southwestern Medical Center company has not reported any.

In the current year, UT Southwestern Medical Center company and Doctors Imaging Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither UT Southwestern Medical Center company nor Doctors Imaging Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Doctors Imaging Group company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other UT Southwestern Medical Center company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Doctors Imaging Group company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while UT Southwestern Medical Center company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Doctors Imaging Group company nor UT Southwestern Medical Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Doctors Imaging Group nor UT Southwestern Medical Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

UT Southwestern Medical Center company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Doctors Imaging Group company.

UT Southwestern Medical Center company employs more people globally than Doctors Imaging Group company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Doctors Imaging Group nor UT Southwestern Medical Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Doctors Imaging Group nor UT Southwestern Medical Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Doctors Imaging Group nor UT Southwestern Medical Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Doctors Imaging Group nor UT Southwestern Medical Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Doctors Imaging Group nor UT Southwestern Medical Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Doctors Imaging Group nor UT Southwestern Medical Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References