Comparison Overview

Doctors Imaging Group

VS

UNC Health

Doctors Imaging Group

6716 NW 11th Pl, Gainesville, 32605, US
Last Update: 2026-01-20

With specialties ranging from 3D mammography to minimally invasive interventional treatments, our board certified radiologists work closely with referring physicians to better understand your needs and are committed to delivering a patient-centered experience. Doctors Imaging Group is a physician-owned radiology practice with outpatient imaging centers in Palatka and Gainesville, Florida. Our radiologists are also on the medical staff and provide coverage for North Florida Regional Medical Center and Lake City Medical Center Radiology Departments.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 67
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

UNC Health

101 Manning Drive, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, US, 27516
Last Update: 2026-01-24
Between 750 and 799

Our mission is to improve the health and well-being of North Carolinians and others whom we serve. We accomplish this by providing leadership and excellence in the interrelated areas of patient care, education and research. UNC Health and its 40,000 teammates, continue to serve as North Carolina’s Health Care System, caring for patients from all 100 counties and beyond our borders. We continue to leverage the world class research conducted in the UNC School of Medicine, translating that innovation to life-saving and life-changing therapies, procedures, and techniques for the patients who rely on us. General terms of service for UNC Health social media: https://www.facebook.com/unchealthcare/about_details

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 19,399
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/doctors-imaging-group.jpeg
Doctors Imaging Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unchealth.jpeg
UNC Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Doctors Imaging Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
UNC Health
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Doctors Imaging Group in 2026.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UNC Health in 2026.

Incident History — Doctors Imaging Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Doctors Imaging Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — UNC Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UNC Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/doctors-imaging-group.jpeg
Doctors Imaging Group
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2024
Type:Cyber Attack
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Theft for Resale
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: phishing, AI-generated deepfakes, stolen personal data, cryptocurrency extortion
Motivation: financial gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unchealth.jpeg
UNC Health
Incidents

Date Detected: 03/2017
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

UNC Health company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Doctors Imaging Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Doctors Imaging Group company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to UNC Health company.

In the current year, UNC Health company and Doctors Imaging Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither UNC Health company nor Doctors Imaging Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both UNC Health company and Doctors Imaging Group company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Doctors Imaging Group company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while UNC Health company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Doctors Imaging Group company nor UNC Health company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Doctors Imaging Group nor UNC Health holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

UNC Health company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Doctors Imaging Group company.

UNC Health company employs more people globally than Doctors Imaging Group company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Doctors Imaging Group nor UNC Health holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Doctors Imaging Group nor UNC Health holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Doctors Imaging Group nor UNC Health holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Doctors Imaging Group nor UNC Health holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Doctors Imaging Group nor UNC Health holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Doctors Imaging Group nor UNC Health holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.