Comparison Overview

Dean Omar Branham Shirley, LLP

VS

Axiom Deutschland

Dean Omar Branham Shirley, LLP

None, None, Dallas, TX, US, 75202
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

For the client who suffers the wrong doings of big businesses, the Law Offices of DOB+S strive for the respectable vindication deserved. With the right balance of powerful tenacity and caring stability, we reach towards justice. We recognize the authority and responsibility required for law and this is reflected in the attitude and passion of Law Offices of DOB+S.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 48
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Axiom Deutschland

Friedrich-Ebert Anlage 49, None, Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, DE, 60308
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

Bei Axiom treffen hochkarätige juristische Fachkenntnisse auf die Arbeit einer vollumfänglich tätigen Anwaltskanzlei. Vor 24 Jahren haben wir die Branche für alternative Rechtsdienstleistungen begründet und unterstützen heute mehr als 1.500 Rechtsabteilungen weltweit, darunter 68 % der Fortune-100-Unternehmen, mit einer Kundenzufriedenheit von 95 %. Axiom bietet kleinen, mittelständischen und großen Unternehmen einen einzigen vertrauenswürdigen Anbieter, der ein umfassendes Spektrum an rechtlicher Beratung und juristischen Dienstleistungen in mehr als einem Dutzend Tätigkeitsbereichen und allen wichtigen Branchen ermöglicht – und das zu Preisen, die bis zu 50 % unter denen regional tätiger Kanzleien liegen. Besuchen Sie uns auf axiomlaw.de und erfahren Sie, wie Axiom Ihrer Rechtsabteilung dabei helfen kann, mit weniger mehr zu erreichen.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dobslegal.jpeg
Dean Omar Branham Shirley, LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/axiom-deutschland.jpeg
Axiom Deutschland
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Dean Omar Branham Shirley, LLP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Axiom Deutschland
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dean Omar Branham Shirley, LLP in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Axiom Deutschland in 2025.

Incident History — Dean Omar Branham Shirley, LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dean Omar Branham Shirley, LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Axiom Deutschland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Axiom Deutschland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dobslegal.jpeg
Dean Omar Branham Shirley, LLP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/axiom-deutschland.jpeg
Axiom Deutschland
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Dean Omar Branham Shirley, LLP company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Axiom Deutschland company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Axiom Deutschland company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Dean Omar Branham Shirley, LLP company.

In the current year, Axiom Deutschland company and Dean Omar Branham Shirley, LLP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Axiom Deutschland company nor Dean Omar Branham Shirley, LLP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Axiom Deutschland company nor Dean Omar Branham Shirley, LLP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Axiom Deutschland company nor Dean Omar Branham Shirley, LLP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Dean Omar Branham Shirley, LLP company nor Axiom Deutschland company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Dean Omar Branham Shirley, LLP nor Axiom Deutschland holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Dean Omar Branham Shirley, LLP company nor Axiom Deutschland company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Dean Omar Branham Shirley, LLP company employs more people globally than Axiom Deutschland company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Dean Omar Branham Shirley, LLP nor Axiom Deutschland holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Dean Omar Branham Shirley, LLP nor Axiom Deutschland holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Dean Omar Branham Shirley, LLP nor Axiom Deutschland holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Dean Omar Branham Shirley, LLP nor Axiom Deutschland holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Dean Omar Branham Shirley, LLP nor Axiom Deutschland holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Dean Omar Branham Shirley, LLP nor Axiom Deutschland holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X