Comparison Overview

DnA Architects

VS

RNL

DnA Architects

Unit 2, Jolimont, WA, 6014, AU
Last Update: 2025-03-07 (UTC)

Excellent

DnA Architects offers clients creativity and knowledge, to design, document and see through to completion building projects and masterplans. We deliver efficient, sustainable and smart architecture with a sense of place and functionality for the life of a building. Our founding Director has 28 yearsโ€™ experience including career work in London and Sydney. We proudly serve a range of clients and users across different project types and sizes including sacred projects for communities, industrial, commercial and residential sectors. Our prime motivation is our clientโ€™s satisfaction and the genuine desire to make positive contributions to peopleโ€™s lives through social and environmentally sustainable design outcomes. We call this โ€˜temple realisationโ€™ and apply this thinking to all projects.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

RNL

1050 17th Street Suite A200 Denver, CO 80265, US
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

RNL has joined Stantec, an architecture and engineering firm with more than 22,000 creative team members across six continents. Beginning March 19, we will be sharing all news and updates via Stantec's pages. We encourage you to follow www.linkedin.com/company/stantec/ for the latest on us and the rest of the Stantec team!

NAICS: 54131
NAICS Definition: Architectural Services
Employees: 10,001+
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dna-architects.jpeg
DnA Architects
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rnl.jpeg
RNL
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
DnA Architects
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
RNL
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Architecture and Planning Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DnA Architects in 2025.

Incidents vs Architecture and Planning Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RNL in 2025.

Incident History โ€” DnA Architects (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DnA Architects cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” RNL (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RNL cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dna-architects.jpeg
DnA Architects
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rnl.jpeg
RNL
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both DnA Architects company and RNL company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, RNL company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to DnA Architects company.

In the current year, RNL company and DnA Architects company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither RNL company nor DnA Architects company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither RNL company nor DnA Architects company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither RNL company nor DnA Architects company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither DnA Architects company nor RNL company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither DnA Architects company nor RNL company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

DnA Architects company employs more people globally than RNL company, reflecting its scale as a Architecture and Planning.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

An issue was discovered in chinabugotech hutool before 5.8.4 allowing attackers to execute arbitrary expressions that lead to arbitrary method invocation and potentially remote code execution (RCE) via the QLExpressEngine class.

Description

A weakness has been identified in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /sys/role/exportXls. This manipulation causes improper authorization. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /sys/user/exportXls of the component Filter Handler. The manipulation results in improper authorization. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was identified in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. Impacted is an unknown function of the file /sys/tenant/deleteBatch. The manipulation of the argument ids leads to improper authorization. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitability is considered difficult. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was determined in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /api/getDepartUserList. Executing manipulation of the argument departId can lead to improper authorization. The attack can be executed remotely. This attack is characterized by high complexity. The exploitability is assessed as difficult. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X