Comparison Overview

DnA Architects

VS

KlingStubbins

DnA Architects

Unit 2, Jolimont, WA, 6014, AU
Last Update: 2025-03-07 (UTC)

Excellent

DnA Architects offers clients creativity and knowledge, to design, document and see through to completion building projects and masterplans. We deliver efficient, sustainable and smart architecture with a sense of place and functionality for the life of a building. Our founding Director has 28 yearsโ€™ experience including career work in London and Sydney. We proudly serve a range of clients and users across different project types and sizes including sacred projects for communities, industrial, commercial and residential sectors. Our prime motivation is our clientโ€™s satisfaction and the genuine desire to make positive contributions to peopleโ€™s lives through social and environmentally sustainable design outcomes. We call this โ€˜temple realisationโ€™ and apply this thinking to all projects.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

KlingStubbins

2301 Chestnut Street Philadelphia, PA 19103, US
Last Update: 2025-03-14 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

Kling Stubbins was acquired by Jacobs in 2011. Jacobs, with 2013 revenues of nearly $12 billion, is one of the world's largest and most diverse providers of technical, professional, and construction services. Building strong, long-term relationships with our clients is the key to our success as a company. This page will soon become inactive. Please connect with Jacobs and "follow" us here: http://www.linkedin.com/company/jacobs

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001+
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dna-architects.jpeg
DnA Architects
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/klingstubbins.jpeg
KlingStubbins
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
DnA Architects
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
KlingStubbins
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Architecture and Planning Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DnA Architects in 2025.

Incidents vs Architecture and Planning Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KlingStubbins in 2025.

Incident History โ€” DnA Architects (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DnA Architects cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” KlingStubbins (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KlingStubbins cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dna-architects.jpeg
DnA Architects
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/klingstubbins.jpeg
KlingStubbins
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both DnA Architects company and KlingStubbins company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, KlingStubbins company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to DnA Architects company.

In the current year, KlingStubbins company and DnA Architects company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither KlingStubbins company nor DnA Architects company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither KlingStubbins company nor DnA Architects company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither KlingStubbins company nor DnA Architects company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither DnA Architects company nor KlingStubbins company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither DnA Architects company nor KlingStubbins company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

DnA Architects company employs more people globally than KlingStubbins company, reflecting its scale as a Architecture and Planning.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

An issue was discovered in chinabugotech hutool before 5.8.4 allowing attackers to execute arbitrary expressions that lead to arbitrary method invocation and potentially remote code execution (RCE) via the QLExpressEngine class.

Description

A weakness has been identified in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /sys/role/exportXls. This manipulation causes improper authorization. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /sys/user/exportXls of the component Filter Handler. The manipulation results in improper authorization. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was identified in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. Impacted is an unknown function of the file /sys/tenant/deleteBatch. The manipulation of the argument ids leads to improper authorization. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitability is considered difficult. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was determined in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /api/getDepartUserList. Executing manipulation of the argument departId can lead to improper authorization. The attack can be executed remotely. This attack is characterized by high complexity. The exploitability is assessed as difficult. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X