Comparison Overview

DJM Controls Inc

VS

EDrive Actuators

DJM Controls Inc

335 High St. E., Strathroy, Ontario, N7G 3Z4, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

At DJM Controls Inc. we believe that a well designed and implemented control system can be critical to the overall efficiency of plant equipment and processes. A key factor to this is having the ability to have flexibility in the designs and related software, based on knowledge and experience, and the required business sense to truly understand the needs of our clients. We have collectively over 50 years of experience implementing control system design and software solutions across a breadth of industries and technologies. Added to this is a strong understanding of business organizational and strategic issues which enables us to develop solutions that are business driven as well as technology driven.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

EDrive Actuators

385 Stamm Road, Newington, CT, 06111, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1980, EDrive manufactures electric heavy-duty linear actuators for tough, industrial automation applications. Our products are used in a wide variety of industry applications where conservative design, rugged construction, long life, and high precision are required for success. EDrive Actuators are ideal for replacing older power solutions like hydraulic and pneumatic linear actuators. Our unsurpassed commitment to superior quality, integrity, and customer service means that our customers get the linear motion solutions and technical support they need.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/djm-controls-inc.jpeg
DJM Controls Inc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/edrive-actuators-inc-.jpeg
EDrive Actuators
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
DJM Controls Inc
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
EDrive Actuators
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DJM Controls Inc in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EDrive Actuators in 2025.

Incident History — DJM Controls Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DJM Controls Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — EDrive Actuators (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EDrive Actuators cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/djm-controls-inc.jpeg
DJM Controls Inc
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/edrive-actuators-inc-.jpeg
EDrive Actuators
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

DJM Controls Inc company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to EDrive Actuators company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, EDrive Actuators company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to DJM Controls Inc company.

In the current year, EDrive Actuators company and DJM Controls Inc company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither EDrive Actuators company nor DJM Controls Inc company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither EDrive Actuators company nor DJM Controls Inc company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither EDrive Actuators company nor DJM Controls Inc company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither DJM Controls Inc company nor EDrive Actuators company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither DJM Controls Inc nor EDrive Actuators holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither DJM Controls Inc company nor EDrive Actuators company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

EDrive Actuators company employs more people globally than DJM Controls Inc company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither DJM Controls Inc nor EDrive Actuators holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither DJM Controls Inc nor EDrive Actuators holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither DJM Controls Inc nor EDrive Actuators holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither DJM Controls Inc nor EDrive Actuators holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither DJM Controls Inc nor EDrive Actuators holds HIPAA certification.

Neither DJM Controls Inc nor EDrive Actuators holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H