Comparison Overview

Dixie Graphics

VS

Jet

Dixie Graphics

636 Grassmere Park, Nashville, Tennessee, 37211, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

DG is a brand services partner specializing in end–to-end, value-based solutions in multiple industries. Those industries include consumer packaged goods companies (CPGs), printer/converters, and architectural sign fabricators. We implement world class LEAN manufacturing principles with a daily goal of Delighting The Customer. Building on our 110 year experience in prepress and graphic brand solutions, how can we help you grow your business today?

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Jet

US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 800 and 849

Jet is proud to be a market leader by providing clients with custom communication solutions that enhance their brand and revenue growth strategies. Jet brings over 60 years of print expertise to market, and now specializes in card related programs using their innovative and sustainable practices. Through uniquely applied technologies Jet engineers, manufactures and delivers the best in end-to-end solutions for gift, loyalty, membership, insurance and other card programs. Additionally, Jet’s technological diversity provides clients with other innovative services such as; commercial print, daily fulfillment, ongoing personalized programs, and online services. With headquarters and operations in the suburbs of Chicago, Jet is well positioned to support their national client base.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 375
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dixie-graphics.jpeg
Dixie Graphics
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jet.jpeg
Jet
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Dixie Graphics
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Jet
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dixie Graphics in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jet in 2025.

Incident History — Dixie Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dixie Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Jet (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jet cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dixie-graphics.jpeg
Dixie Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jet.jpeg
Jet
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Jet company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Dixie Graphics company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Jet company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Dixie Graphics company.

In the current year, Jet company and Dixie Graphics company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Jet company nor Dixie Graphics company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Jet company nor Dixie Graphics company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Jet company nor Dixie Graphics company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Dixie Graphics company nor Jet company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Dixie Graphics nor Jet holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Dixie Graphics company nor Jet company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Jet company employs more people globally than Dixie Graphics company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Dixie Graphics nor Jet holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Dixie Graphics nor Jet holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Dixie Graphics nor Jet holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Dixie Graphics nor Jet holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Dixie Graphics nor Jet holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Dixie Graphics nor Jet holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N