Comparison Overview

District School Board of Niagara

VS

Bright Horizons

District School Board of Niagara

undefined, St Catharines, Ontario, L2R 7P4, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

The DSBN is home to 79 elementary schools and 17secondary schools in the 12 municipalities that make up the Niagara Region. We are proud to serve over 39,000 students each year. The DSBN is governed by a Board of 11 elected trustees. Providing students with a quality public education that empowers them with the knowledge and desire to chase their dreams requires a continuous team effort. It demands that our teachers, principals, support staff, senior administration and trustees maintain an unwavering focus on student learning.

NAICS: 92311
NAICS Definition: Administration of Education Programs
Employees: 1,829
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Bright Horizons

2 Wells Avenue, Newton, Massachusetts, 02459, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21

More than 1,000 top employers trust Bright Horizons® (NYSE: BFAM) for proven solutions that support employees, advance careers, and maximize performance. From on-site child care that amplify your culture, back-up care to handle disruptions, and education programs that build critical skills, our services help you achieve more. Find more at brighthorizons.com/at-work.

NAICS: 92311
NAICS Definition: Administration of Education Programs
Employees: 13,444
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/district-school-board-of-niagara.jpeg
District School Board of Niagara
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bright-horizons.jpeg
Bright Horizons
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
District School Board of Niagara
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bright Horizons
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Education Administration Programs Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for District School Board of Niagara in 2025.

Incidents vs Education Administration Programs Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bright Horizons in 2025.

Incident History — District School Board of Niagara (X = Date, Y = Severity)

District School Board of Niagara cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bright Horizons (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bright Horizons cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/district-school-board-of-niagara.jpeg
District School Board of Niagara
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2017
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bright-horizons.jpeg
Bright Horizons
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Bright Horizons company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to District School Board of Niagara company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

District School Board of Niagara company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Bright Horizons company has not reported any.

In the current year, Bright Horizons company and District School Board of Niagara company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bright Horizons company nor District School Board of Niagara company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

District School Board of Niagara company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Bright Horizons company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Bright Horizons company nor District School Board of Niagara company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither District School Board of Niagara company nor Bright Horizons company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither District School Board of Niagara nor Bright Horizons holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Bright Horizons company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to District School Board of Niagara company.

Bright Horizons company employs more people globally than District School Board of Niagara company, reflecting its scale as a Education Administration Programs.

Neither District School Board of Niagara nor Bright Horizons holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither District School Board of Niagara nor Bright Horizons holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither District School Board of Niagara nor Bright Horizons holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither District School Board of Niagara nor Bright Horizons holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither District School Board of Niagara nor Bright Horizons holds HIPAA certification.

Neither District School Board of Niagara nor Bright Horizons holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H