Comparison Overview

District 8 Media

VS

Nassau Weekly

District 8 Media

undefined, Los Angeles, CA, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

District 8 Media is a boutique graphic design and publishing company. We offer branding and creative editorial design services for clients, including look-books, pitch decks, and large-scaled wall graphics for clients—all connected with social media, AR, and all those nitty-gritty things. Our mission is to help businesses and organizations tell their stories through beautiful, engaging content. Our vision is to be the go-to source for stunning visual content in Los Angeles and beyond.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Nassau Weekly

None
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 800 and 849

The Nassau Weekly publishes Princeton University campus news, op-eds, essays on culture and politics, personal histories, travel journals, reviews of movies and music, humor, poetry and fiction, and achieved things of other modes. It is published weekly during the academic year, and on special schedules during vacations and examination periods, by the Princeton Broadcasting Service, Inc., a non-profit, tax-exempt, educational corporation run entirely by students of Princeton University. The Princeton Broadcasting Service also operates WPRB 103.3 FM, a community supported commercial radio station broadcasting to central New Jersey and Philadelphia.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/district-8-media.jpeg
District 8 Media
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nassau-weekly.jpeg
Nassau Weekly
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
District 8 Media
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Nassau Weekly
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for District 8 Media in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nassau Weekly in 2025.

Incident History — District 8 Media (X = Date, Y = Severity)

District 8 Media cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Nassau Weekly (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nassau Weekly cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/district-8-media.jpeg
District 8 Media
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nassau-weekly.jpeg
Nassau Weekly
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Nassau Weekly company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to District 8 Media company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Nassau Weekly company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to District 8 Media company.

In the current year, Nassau Weekly company and District 8 Media company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Nassau Weekly company nor District 8 Media company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Nassau Weekly company nor District 8 Media company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Nassau Weekly company nor District 8 Media company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither District 8 Media company nor Nassau Weekly company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither District 8 Media nor Nassau Weekly holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither District 8 Media company nor Nassau Weekly company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Nassau Weekly company employs more people globally than District 8 Media company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither District 8 Media nor Nassau Weekly holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither District 8 Media nor Nassau Weekly holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither District 8 Media nor Nassau Weekly holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither District 8 Media nor Nassau Weekly holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither District 8 Media nor Nassau Weekly holds HIPAA certification.

Neither District 8 Media nor Nassau Weekly holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.