Comparison Overview

DISH Network

VS

Ooredoo Group

DISH Network

9601 S. Meridian Blvd, Englewood, CO, 80112, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://careers.dish.com

Our adventure began by changing the way people watched TV, bringing DISH to where big cable wouldn’t: rural America. Since then, we have reinvented ourselves and our own industry with Sling TV to give millions of consumers more choice in entertainment. Today, we’ve officially entered the consumer wireless industry as the fourth largest wireless provider with our acquisitions of Boost Mobile, Ting Mobile and Gen Mobile — but that’s just the start. We’re building America’s first cloud-native 5G network to transform the way we live, work and play with unlimited possibilities.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 23,216
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2
View Profile

Ooredoo Group

100 West Bay, Doha, Doha, Po Box 217, QA
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ooredoo.com

We are an award-winning international communications company operating across the Middle East, North Africa and Southeast Asia. Serving consumers and businesses in 10 countries, we deliver a leading data experience through a broad range of content and services via our advanced, data-centric mobile and fixed networks. With a customer base of more than 138 million people, we work hard to provide the best customer and network experience we can. We believe in the power of mobile technology to bring about social and economic progress.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 29,362
Subsidiaries: 9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dish-network.jpeg
DISH Network
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ooredoo-group.jpeg
Ooredoo Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
DISH Network
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ooredoo Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DISH Network in 2025.

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ooredoo Group in 2025.

Incident History — DISH Network (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DISH Network cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ooredoo Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ooredoo Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dish-network.jpeg
DISH Network
Incidents

Date Detected: 05/2023
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Compromised Windows domain controllers
Motivation: Ransom
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 02/2023
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2019
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ooredoo-group.jpeg
Ooredoo Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Ooredoo Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to DISH Network company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

DISH Network company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Ooredoo Group company has not reported any.

In the current year, Ooredoo Group company and DISH Network company have not reported any cyber incidents.

DISH Network company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Ooredoo Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

DISH Network company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Ooredoo Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Ooredoo Group company nor DISH Network company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither DISH Network company nor Ooredoo Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither DISH Network nor Ooredoo Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Ooredoo Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to DISH Network company.

Ooredoo Group company employs more people globally than DISH Network company, reflecting its scale as a Telecommunications.

Neither DISH Network nor Ooredoo Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither DISH Network nor Ooredoo Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither DISH Network nor Ooredoo Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither DISH Network nor Ooredoo Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither DISH Network nor Ooredoo Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither DISH Network nor Ooredoo Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References