Comparison Overview

DISH Network

VS

Jio

DISH Network

9601 S. Meridian Blvd, Englewood, CO, 80112, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 650 and 699

Our adventure began by changing the way people watched TV, bringing DISH to where big cable wouldn’t: rural America. Since then, we have reinvented ourselves and our own industry with Sling TV to give millions of consumers more choice in entertainment. Today, we’ve officially entered the consumer wireless industry as the fourth largest wireless provider with our acquisitions of Boost Mobile, Ting Mobile and Gen Mobile — but that’s just the start. We’re building America’s first cloud-native 5G network to transform the way we live, work and play with unlimited possibilities.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 23,216
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Jio

Reliance Corporate Park, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400701, IN
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Make a new start. A start that will build beautiful relationships, shape millions of ideas. Enable a new way to live, learn, work and play. At Jio, we build products and services of the future to empower billions of Indians make their dreams a reality. Jio is about YOU. Join the movement to make India Digital. Chat on MyJio App: http://tiny.jio.com/chat1 Chat on WhatsApp: http://tiny.jio.com/LiveChat

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 97,138
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dish-network.jpeg
DISH Network
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jio.jpeg
Jio
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
DISH Network
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Jio
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DISH Network in 2025.

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jio in 2025.

Incident History — DISH Network (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DISH Network cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Jio (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jio cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dish-network.jpeg
DISH Network
Incidents

Date Detected: 05/2023
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Compromised Windows domain controllers
Motivation: Ransom
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 02/2023
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2019
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jio.jpeg
Jio
Incidents

Date Detected: 05/2020
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Unsecured Database
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 07/2017
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 02/2017
Type:Data Leak
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Jio company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to DISH Network company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

DISH Network and Jio have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Jio company and DISH Network company have not reported any cyber incidents.

DISH Network company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Jio company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both Jio company and DISH Network company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither Jio company nor DISH Network company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither DISH Network company nor Jio company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither DISH Network nor Jio holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

DISH Network company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Jio company.

Jio company employs more people globally than DISH Network company, reflecting its scale as a Telecommunications.

Neither DISH Network nor Jio holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither DISH Network nor Jio holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither DISH Network nor Jio holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither DISH Network nor Jio holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither DISH Network nor Jio holds HIPAA certification.

Neither DISH Network nor Jio holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N