Comparison Overview

DISH Network

VS

Airtel Africa

DISH Network

9601 S. Meridian Blvd, Englewood, CO, 80112, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://careers.dish.com

Our adventure began by changing the way people watched TV, bringing DISH to where big cable wouldn’t: rural America. Since then, we have reinvented ourselves and our own industry with Sling TV to give millions of consumers more choice in entertainment. Today, we’ve officially entered the consumer wireless industry as the fourth largest wireless provider with our acquisitions of Boost Mobile, Ting Mobile and Gen Mobile — but that’s just the start. We’re building America’s first cloud-native 5G network to transform the way we live, work and play with unlimited possibilities.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 23,216
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2
View Profile

Airtel Africa

The Oval, Ringroad Parklands, Nairobi, Nairobi, KE, 00100
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
https://airtel.africa/

Airtel Africa is a leading provider of telecommunications and mobile money services, with a presence in 14 countries in Africa, primarily in East Africa and Central and West Africa. Airtel Africa offers an integrated suite of telecommunications solutions to its subscribers, including mobile voice and data services as well as mobile money services both nationally and internationally. The Group aims to continue providing a simple and intuitive customer experience through streamlined customer journeys

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 14,896
Subsidiaries: 18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dish-network.jpeg
DISH Network
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/airtel-africa.jpeg
Airtel Africa
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
DISH Network
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Airtel Africa
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DISH Network in 2025.

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Airtel Africa in 2025.

Incident History — DISH Network (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DISH Network cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Airtel Africa (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Airtel Africa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dish-network.jpeg
DISH Network
Incidents

Date Detected: 05/2023
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Compromised Windows domain controllers
Motivation: Ransom
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 02/2023
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2019
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/airtel-africa.jpeg
Airtel Africa
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Airtel Africa company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to DISH Network company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

DISH Network company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Airtel Africa company has not reported any.

In the current year, Airtel Africa company and DISH Network company have not reported any cyber incidents.

DISH Network company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Airtel Africa company has not reported such incidents publicly.

DISH Network company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Airtel Africa company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Airtel Africa company nor DISH Network company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither DISH Network company nor Airtel Africa company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither DISH Network nor Airtel Africa holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Airtel Africa company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to DISH Network company.

DISH Network company employs more people globally than Airtel Africa company, reflecting its scale as a Telecommunications.

Neither DISH Network nor Airtel Africa holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither DISH Network nor Airtel Africa holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither DISH Network nor Airtel Africa holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither DISH Network nor Airtel Africa holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither DISH Network nor Airtel Africa holds HIPAA certification.

Neither DISH Network nor Airtel Africa holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References