Comparison Overview

DISfunkshion Magazine

VS

Creditflux

DISfunkshion Magazine

None
Last Update: 2025-11-26

DISfunkshion Magazine is a multi-genre national publication in a breed of its own. As a hybrid magazine (print and online), DISfunkshion stays on the radar through newsstand exposure and a constant online presence. Unlike any other magazine, DISfunkshion has merged several magazine genres into one. Fashion, culture, surf, women's issues, luxury and budget friendly lifestyles, social awareness and eyecandy! With Disfunkshion Magazine, every young woman can be heard, through her heart-felt words of wisdom, or through the medium of art. The painters, illustrators, poets, songwriters, surfers, photographers and other artists will have the opportunity to showcase their talents and passions as a true expression of themselves in a publication that is for them and supports their innovative spirits. Like no other, Disfunkshion Magazine is intended to touch the heart and soul of every young woman.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Creditflux

10 Queen Street Place, London, State/Province, EC4R 1BE, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 700 and 749

Creditflux is primarily a news publication (print and online) covering global credit investing and trading with news, comment, analysis and data on the credit markets. We also offer a separate data product called CLO-i which gives subscribers the inside track on CLO activity and performance, including b-wic and secondary trading prices, primary & secondary market data and manager performance using over 18,000 trustee reports. cloi.creditflux.com Creditflux runs conferences in both London & New York covering the structured credit market and since 20017 has run the prestigious, global CLO Manager Awards annually in London.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/disfunkshion-magazine.jpeg
DISfunkshion Magazine
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/creditflux.jpeg
Creditflux
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
DISfunkshion Magazine
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Creditflux
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DISfunkshion Magazine in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Creditflux in 2025.

Incident History — DISfunkshion Magazine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DISfunkshion Magazine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Creditflux (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Creditflux cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/disfunkshion-magazine.jpeg
DISfunkshion Magazine
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/creditflux.jpeg
Creditflux
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

DISfunkshion Magazine company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Creditflux company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Creditflux company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to DISfunkshion Magazine company.

In the current year, Creditflux company and DISfunkshion Magazine company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Creditflux company nor DISfunkshion Magazine company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Creditflux company nor DISfunkshion Magazine company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Creditflux company nor DISfunkshion Magazine company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither DISfunkshion Magazine company nor Creditflux company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither DISfunkshion Magazine nor Creditflux holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Creditflux company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to DISfunkshion Magazine company.

Creditflux company employs more people globally than DISfunkshion Magazine company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither DISfunkshion Magazine nor Creditflux holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither DISfunkshion Magazine nor Creditflux holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither DISfunkshion Magazine nor Creditflux holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither DISfunkshion Magazine nor Creditflux holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither DISfunkshion Magazine nor Creditflux holds HIPAA certification.

Neither DISfunkshion Magazine nor Creditflux holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.