Comparison Overview

Discovery Point Retreat

VS

Finemind

Discovery Point Retreat

530 Hight Rd, None, Waxahachie, Texas, US, 75167
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://discoverypointretreat.com/

Discovery Point Retreat is a leading Joint Commission accredited rehab center in Texas providing evidence-based, outcome driven and affordable addiction treatment. With a full continuum including medical detoxification, inpatient and outpatient programs, we can offer the right level of care at the right time for adults struggling with substance use and co-occurring mental health conditions like depression, anxiety and trauma. Discovery Point Retreat is renowned for clinical excellence and remarkable results. We are committed to the ongoing success of our clients, offering a treatment guarantee, extensive aftercare planning services, and lifelong alumni support.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 58
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Finemind

undefined, Denver, CO, 80247, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.afinemind.org

Finemind lifts up communities by providing mental health services that nurture hope and belonging. Our curriculum focuses on equipping local trainees with the knowledge, skills, and competencies to offer effective psychosocial support for individuals struggling with depression and anxiety. Access to mental health care is a fundamental human right. It is not luxury, nor is it discretionary - it is vital. Mental healthcare affords someone the basic tools to take better charge of one's needs and to live a purposeful life. If depression is present and not addressed, it affects other necessary life functions. Finemind's impact doesn’t end with the individual; the real transformation happens when the community is lifted, too. We firmly stand by the adage, “There is no health without mental health.”

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/discovery-point-retreat.jpeg
Discovery Point Retreat
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/finemind.jpeg
Finemind
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Discovery Point Retreat
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Finemind
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Discovery Point Retreat in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Finemind in 2026.

Incident History — Discovery Point Retreat (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Discovery Point Retreat cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Finemind (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Finemind cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/discovery-point-retreat.jpeg
Discovery Point Retreat
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/finemind.jpeg
Finemind
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Discovery Point Retreat company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Finemind company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Finemind company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Discovery Point Retreat company.

In the current year, Finemind company and Discovery Point Retreat company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Finemind company nor Discovery Point Retreat company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Finemind company nor Discovery Point Retreat company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Finemind company nor Discovery Point Retreat company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Discovery Point Retreat company nor Finemind company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Discovery Point Retreat nor Finemind holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Discovery Point Retreat company nor Finemind company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Discovery Point Retreat company employs more people globally than Finemind company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Discovery Point Retreat nor Finemind holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Discovery Point Retreat nor Finemind holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Discovery Point Retreat nor Finemind holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Discovery Point Retreat nor Finemind holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Discovery Point Retreat nor Finemind holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Discovery Point Retreat nor Finemind holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References