Comparison Overview

Discovery Museum

VS

Lincoln Park Conservancy

Discovery Museum

7 Hombori Crescent, Wuse II, NG
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

The Discovery Museum is the focal point of The Art Tech District of Nigeria and is the first in the region devoted to shaping the narrative of culture, people and democratic ideals through the intersection of technology and art. Located in The Nation’s Capital, our goal is to create a digital community of artists, storytellers and techies through the promotion of innovative methods of curation, commissions, acquisitions and residencies. The Discovery Museum aims to spark innovation, fuel creativity and transform minds.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Lincoln Park Conservancy

2430 N Cannon Dr, Chicago, Illinois, US, 60614
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Lincoln Park is Chicago’s largest and most visited park and the third most visited city park in the U.S. with over 20 million visitors annually. The Park is Chicago’s front door and is often called Chicago’s ‘Central Park.’ The Lincoln Park Conservancy’s mission is to preserve and enhance Lincoln Park’s inspiring beauty for current and future generations. Established in 1984, the Lincoln Park Conservancy works to enhance Chicago’s largest park through volunteer power, fundraising and park improvements. Through its master agreement with the Chicago Park District, the Conservancy manages treasured Park sites including the Alfred Caldwell Lily Pool, Abraham Lincoln Monument and Gardens, Lincoln Park Conservatory and North Pond Nature Sanctuary, in addition to general stewardship activities across Lincoln Park’s 1,200 acres. Our volunteer docents offer free tours of the park's natural, historic and cultural elements in order to build visitor connections to these unique places. Monthly wildflower walks are hosted at the Lily Pool and North Pond, educating guests about Chicago's historic connection to them and their importance to local ecology. Conservancy volunteers give back nearly 3,000 hours of service each year, engaging with park visitors and maintaining this portion of Lincoln Park. One unique aspect of the Conservancy’s approach is that when the Conservancy commits to a site, it embarks on the site’s long-term care and if needed, restoration. As the Conservancy’s managed sites are free of admission, the private funding we raise to support these park assets is of central importance.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/discovery-museum.jpeg
Discovery Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lincolnparkconservancy.jpeg
Lincoln Park Conservancy
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Discovery Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lincoln Park Conservancy
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Discovery Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lincoln Park Conservancy in 2026.

Incident History — Discovery Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Discovery Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lincoln Park Conservancy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lincoln Park Conservancy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/discovery-museum.jpeg
Discovery Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lincolnparkconservancy.jpeg
Lincoln Park Conservancy
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lincoln Park Conservancy company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Discovery Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Lincoln Park Conservancy company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Discovery Museum company.

In the current year, Lincoln Park Conservancy company and Discovery Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lincoln Park Conservancy company nor Discovery Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lincoln Park Conservancy company nor Discovery Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lincoln Park Conservancy company nor Discovery Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Discovery Museum company nor Lincoln Park Conservancy company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Discovery Museum nor Lincoln Park Conservancy holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Discovery Museum company nor Lincoln Park Conservancy company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lincoln Park Conservancy company employs more people globally than Discovery Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Discovery Museum nor Lincoln Park Conservancy holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Discovery Museum nor Lincoln Park Conservancy holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Discovery Museum nor Lincoln Park Conservancy holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Discovery Museum nor Lincoln Park Conservancy holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Discovery Museum nor Lincoln Park Conservancy holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Discovery Museum nor Lincoln Park Conservancy holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.