Comparison Overview

Discover

VS

Goldman Sachs

Discover

2500 Lake Cook Road, None, Riverwoods, IL, US, 60015
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 650 and 699

Discover® is now part of Capital One. Together, we’ll continue to deliver exceptional financial products and experiences, drive innovation, and serve customers. Find the latest updates at https://capitalonediscover.com. Discover is one of the most recognized brands in the U.S. with the Discover® card, America's cash rewards pioneer, and offers personal loans, home loans, checking and savings accounts and certificates of deposit. The Discover Global Network® is comprised of Discover Network, with millions of merchants and cash access locations; PULSE®, one of the nation's leading ATM/debit networks; and Diners Club International®, a global payments network with acceptance around the world.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 21,528
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
34
Attack type number
2

Goldman Sachs

200 West Street, New York, New York, US, 10282
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 800 and 849

We aspire to be the world’s most exceptional financial institution, united by our shared values of partnership, client service, integrity, and excellence. Operating at the center of capital markets, we act as one firm, mobilizing our people, capital, and ideas to deliver superior results across our clients’ most complex challenges. For 156 years, Goldman Sachs has delivered world-class execution on a global scale across our leading Global Banking & Markets and Asset & Wealth Management businesses. Apprenticeship is central to our culture, with hands-on coaching and access to leaders who bring decades of experience and expertise. With office locations around the world, we offer a broad range of career opportunities to those who insist on excellence and thrive on performance. Find our Social Media Disclosures here: gs.com/social-media-disclosures

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 65,766
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/discover-financial-services.jpeg
Discover
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/goldman-sachs.jpeg
Goldman Sachs
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Discover
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Goldman Sachs
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Discover in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Goldman Sachs in 2025.

Incident History — Discover (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Discover cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Goldman Sachs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Goldman Sachs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/discover-financial-services.jpeg
Discover
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2020
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Inadvertent Disclosure
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2018
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2018
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/goldman-sachs.jpeg
Goldman Sachs
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Goldman Sachs company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Discover company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Discover company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Goldman Sachs company has not reported any.

In the current year, Goldman Sachs company and Discover company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Goldman Sachs company nor Discover company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Discover company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Goldman Sachs company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Discover company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Goldman Sachs company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Discover company nor Goldman Sachs company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Discover nor Goldman Sachs holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Goldman Sachs company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Discover company.

Goldman Sachs company employs more people globally than Discover company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither Discover nor Goldman Sachs holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Discover nor Goldman Sachs holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Discover nor Goldman Sachs holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Discover nor Goldman Sachs holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Discover nor Goldman Sachs holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Discover nor Goldman Sachs holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H