Comparison Overview

Disability Rights Maryland

VS

Legacy Law Firm, P.C.

Disability Rights Maryland

1500 Union Ave., Ste. 2000, Baltimore, MD, 21211, US
Last Update: 2025-11-23

Disability Rights Maryland (DRM) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization that protects and advances the rights of people with disabilities in Maryland. We provide free legal support to address issues like abuse, neglect or discrimination which might occur in education, housing, transportation, healthcare, voting, and more. DRM works to ensure that people with disabilities don’t have to live in institutions unnecessarily. We envision a world where everyone has access to the services they need to fully participate in the workplace, neighborhoods, and all aspects of community life.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 54
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Legacy Law Firm, P.C.

7404 S Bitterroot Pl, Sioux Falls, 57108, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Welcome to Legacy Law Firm, P.C. We are a boutique law firm providing legal services in estate planning, elder law, and business planning. We are dedicated to offering impeccable personalized service and attention to each and every client at every stage of life’s journey. We hope to keep you up to date on our company and industry by posting about topics related to estate planning, elder law, business planning and our amazing staff! Thank you for following us on LinkedIn! Be sure to check out our Facebook page and our website for more information.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/disabilityrightsmd.jpeg
Disability Rights Maryland
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/legacy-law-firm-p.c..jpeg
Legacy Law Firm, P.C.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Disability Rights Maryland
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Legacy Law Firm, P.C.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Disability Rights Maryland in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Legacy Law Firm, P.C. in 2025.

Incident History — Disability Rights Maryland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Disability Rights Maryland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Legacy Law Firm, P.C. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Legacy Law Firm, P.C. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/disabilityrightsmd.jpeg
Disability Rights Maryland
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/legacy-law-firm-p.c..jpeg
Legacy Law Firm, P.C.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Disability Rights Maryland company and Legacy Law Firm, P.C. company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Legacy Law Firm, P.C. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Disability Rights Maryland company.

In the current year, Legacy Law Firm, P.C. company and Disability Rights Maryland company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Legacy Law Firm, P.C. company nor Disability Rights Maryland company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Legacy Law Firm, P.C. company nor Disability Rights Maryland company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Legacy Law Firm, P.C. company nor Disability Rights Maryland company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Disability Rights Maryland company nor Legacy Law Firm, P.C. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Disability Rights Maryland nor Legacy Law Firm, P.C. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Disability Rights Maryland company nor Legacy Law Firm, P.C. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Disability Rights Maryland company employs more people globally than Legacy Law Firm, P.C. company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Disability Rights Maryland nor Legacy Law Firm, P.C. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Disability Rights Maryland nor Legacy Law Firm, P.C. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Disability Rights Maryland nor Legacy Law Firm, P.C. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Disability Rights Maryland nor Legacy Law Firm, P.C. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Disability Rights Maryland nor Legacy Law Firm, P.C. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Disability Rights Maryland nor Legacy Law Firm, P.C. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X