Comparison Overview

Disability Rights UK

VS

Australian Civil-Military Centre

Disability Rights UK

14 East Bay Lane , London, London, E20 3BS, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-24
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.disabilityrightsuk.org

Disability Rights UK works to create a society where everyone with lived experience of disability or health conditions can participate equally as full citizens. We are disabled people leading change to: - Mobilise disabled people’s leadership and control – in our own lives, our organisations and society - Achieve independent living in practice - Break the link between disability and poverty - Put disability equality and human rights into practice across society Our Mission We strengthen the voice of disabled people to make our rights real, as an effective national organisation led by people with a wide range of impairments or health conditions. Disability Rights UK was formed through a unification of Disability Alliance, Radar and National Centre for Independent Living on 1 January 2012. SIGN UP FOR OUR FREE E-NEWSLETTER (http://www.disabilityrightsuk.org/about-us/sign-our-e-newsletter)

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 54
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Australian Civil-Military Centre

PO Box 7947, CANBERRA BC, ACT, 2610, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-14
Between 700 and 749
http://www.acmc.gov.au

The Australian Government’s establishment of the Australian Civil-Military Centre (ACMC) recognises the growing importance of civil-military collaboration and demonstrates Australia’s commitment to sustainable peace and prosperity in the Asia-Pacific and more globally. Australia has a long and proud record of contributing to peace and stabilisation operations, and to disaster management overseas. The ACMC works with government and non-government stakeholders to build even more integrated national and international civil-military approaches to conflict and disaster management. The ACMC is administered by Defence, but reflects a whole-of-government approach with personnel seconded from a number of departments and agencies. Applying a collaborative approach with government agencies, the United Nations and other relevant partners, the Centre focuses on improving civil-military education and training, and developing civil-military doctrine and guiding principles. Through its research program on relevant civil-military issues, the ACMC identifies best practice responses to key lessons learned and recommends their application to achieve continuous improvement. We work with our partners and stakeholders to provide a valued resource in achieving effective civil-military outcomes.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 28
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/disability-rights-uk.jpeg
Disability Rights UK
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/australian-civil-military-centre.jpeg
Australian Civil-Military Centre
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Disability Rights UK
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Australian Civil-Military Centre
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Disability Rights UK in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Australian Civil-Military Centre in 2025.

Incident History — Disability Rights UK (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Disability Rights UK cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Australian Civil-Military Centre (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Australian Civil-Military Centre cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/disability-rights-uk.jpeg
Disability Rights UK
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/australian-civil-military-centre.jpeg
Australian Civil-Military Centre
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Disability Rights UK company and Australian Civil-Military Centre company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Australian Civil-Military Centre company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Disability Rights UK company.

In the current year, Australian Civil-Military Centre company and Disability Rights UK company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Australian Civil-Military Centre company nor Disability Rights UK company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Australian Civil-Military Centre company nor Disability Rights UK company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Australian Civil-Military Centre company nor Disability Rights UK company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Disability Rights UK company nor Australian Civil-Military Centre company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Disability Rights UK nor Australian Civil-Military Centre holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Disability Rights UK company nor Australian Civil-Military Centre company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Disability Rights UK company employs more people globally than Australian Civil-Military Centre company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Disability Rights UK nor Australian Civil-Military Centre holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Disability Rights UK nor Australian Civil-Military Centre holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Disability Rights UK nor Australian Civil-Military Centre holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Disability Rights UK nor Australian Civil-Military Centre holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Disability Rights UK nor Australian Civil-Military Centre holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Disability Rights UK nor Australian Civil-Military Centre holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References