Comparison Overview

Disability Rights DC at University Legal Services

VS

Pangea Legal Services

Disability Rights DC at University Legal Services

220 I St NE, Washington, District of Columbia, 20002, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Disability Rights DC (DRDC) at University Legal Services is a private, non-profit organization that protects and promotes the human, civil, and legal rights of persons who have disabilities in the District of Columbia. As the federally-designated protection and advocacy program for people with disabilities in the District of Columbia and the Client Assistance Program, DRDC engages in a variety of activities to protect and advocate for the rights of people with disabilities including: individual representation, systemic advocacy, community outreach and education and investigation of abuse and neglect. All services are provided free-of-charge to eligible individuals with disabilities, according to DRDC’s annual objectives and priorities.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 28
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Pangea Legal Services

350 Sansome St, Ste 650, San Francisco, CA, 94104, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

VISION We envision a world where the fundamental right to move is respected and appreciated by all. Our view is that all human beings are entitled to respect, documents, and a process through which to move, settle and resettle in the world. MISSION The mission of Pangea Legal Services is to stand with immigrant communities and provide services in the areas of direct legal representation (particularly in deportation defense), policy advocacy, and community education. WHAT DOES PANGEA MEAN? Pangea was the name of the earth's original continent when it was one connected landmass. For us, "Pangea"​ symbolizes the unity and oneness of our global community.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

Compliance Summary
Disability Rights DC at University Legal Services
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Pangea Legal Services
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Disability Rights DC at University Legal Services in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pangea Legal Services in 2025.

Incident History — Disability Rights DC at University Legal Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Disability Rights DC at University Legal Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Pangea Legal Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pangea Legal Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/disability-rights-dc-at-university-legal-services.jpeg
Disability Rights DC at University Legal Services
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pangea-legal-services.jpeg
Pangea Legal Services
Incidents

FAQ

Disability Rights DC at University Legal Services company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Pangea Legal Services company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Pangea Legal Services company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Disability Rights DC at University Legal Services company.

In the current year, Pangea Legal Services company and Disability Rights DC at University Legal Services company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Pangea Legal Services company nor Disability Rights DC at University Legal Services company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Pangea Legal Services company nor Disability Rights DC at University Legal Services company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Pangea Legal Services company nor Disability Rights DC at University Legal Services company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Disability Rights DC at University Legal Services company nor Pangea Legal Services company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Disability Rights DC at University Legal Services nor Pangea Legal Services holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Disability Rights DC at University Legal Services company nor Pangea Legal Services company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Disability Rights DC at University Legal Services company employs more people globally than Pangea Legal Services company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Disability Rights DC at University Legal Services nor Pangea Legal Services holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Disability Rights DC at University Legal Services nor Pangea Legal Services holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Disability Rights DC at University Legal Services nor Pangea Legal Services holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Disability Rights DC at University Legal Services nor Pangea Legal Services holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Disability Rights DC at University Legal Services nor Pangea Legal Services holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Disability Rights DC at University Legal Services nor Pangea Legal Services holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X