Comparison Overview

Dipping Brush

VS

KURTZ

Dipping Brush

None
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

At Dipping Brush, our mission is to simply deliver what customer expects and automate it. Company specializes in branding, video editing, image editing and 2d 3d design. We believe in the power of Dipping Brush in building stronger relationships with customers and achieve more by helping people everywhere connect and unleash their human potential through seamless, perfectly aligned incentive compensation. Our official website will provide you with more information about Dipping Brush and our service line. If you would like more details or to avail our services, please feel free to drop your queries at [email protected]. Also we can sync up over a call. Our contact: +91-8105944598(India), +1(512) 436-3238(USA)

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

KURTZ

PO Box 1116, Hudson, Ohio, 44236, US
Last Update: 2025-11-29
Between 700 and 749

Are You a Marketing or Business Leader? Are you up against tight deadlines, limited budgets, or a lack of in-house creative? Are you juggling high expectations or unrealistic goals? All while managing more projects than anyone should have to handle? At KURTZ, we understand how this drains your energy and leads to lackluster results. That’s why we partner with you to take work off your plate. So you can focus on your zone of genius; the things only you can do.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dipping-brush.jpeg
Dipping Brush
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-kurtz-graphic-design-co-.jpeg
KURTZ
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Dipping Brush
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
KURTZ
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dipping Brush in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KURTZ in 2025.

Incident History — Dipping Brush (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dipping Brush cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — KURTZ (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KURTZ cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dipping-brush.jpeg
Dipping Brush
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-kurtz-graphic-design-co-.jpeg
KURTZ
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Dipping Brush company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to KURTZ company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, KURTZ company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Dipping Brush company.

In the current year, KURTZ company and Dipping Brush company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither KURTZ company nor Dipping Brush company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither KURTZ company nor Dipping Brush company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither KURTZ company nor Dipping Brush company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Dipping Brush company nor KURTZ company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Dipping Brush nor KURTZ holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Dipping Brush company nor KURTZ company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

KURTZ company employs more people globally than Dipping Brush company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Dipping Brush nor KURTZ holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Dipping Brush nor KURTZ holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Dipping Brush nor KURTZ holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Dipping Brush nor KURTZ holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Dipping Brush nor KURTZ holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Dipping Brush nor KURTZ holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X