Comparison Overview

DipJar

VS

Barton Springs Conservancy

DipJar

607 Washington Rd, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15228, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

DipJar enables cashless generosity via a hardware, software, and payments platform for joyful, friction-free donations. With DipJar, organizations large and small can collect new donations and capture new donors wherever they're face-to-face with supporters — at their headquarters, at special events, and in cause marketing campaigns with corporate and retail partners. As usage of cash, checks, and paper pledge cards declines, DipJar steps in to keep fundraising fast and easy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLoMyVQB9uY

NAICS: 561499
NAICS Definition: All Other Business Support Services
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Barton Springs Conservancy

None
Last Update: 2025-12-21

Barton Springs Conservancy works to honor, preserve and enhance the experience of Barton Springs through education and facility improvement. Barton Springs Conservancy was formed in 2014 to work with key Barton Springs stakeholders to identify and support projects to benefit Barton Springs. Initial efforts focused on establishing fundraising capacity and providing community input to complete the Barton Springs Bathhouse Rehabilitation project called for in the 2008 Barton Springs Master Plan and partially funded by the 2012 Bond Package. Through the community input process, a number of facility improvement and education projects have been identified and our For the Love of the Springs Campaign was born. Currently funded projects include the Zilker Park Gatepost Restoration project to restore the historic entrance gateposts at the north entrance to Barton Springs Pool. Partially funded projects include the Historic Barton Springs Bathhouse Rehabilitation as called for in the 2008 Barton Springs Master Plan and proposed creation of a world class Visitor's Education Center for Zilker Park. Capital Campaign Committee Luci Baines Johnson, Honorary Campaign Chair Maryann Bell, Campaign Co-Chair Will Wynn, Campaign Co-Chair Gene Attal Mike Cannatti Nikki Graham Tracy King Emily Little Terri Von Dohlen Tyson Tuttle Board of Directors Mike Cannatti, President Maryann Bell, Campaign Co-Chair Emily Little, VP Architecture and Design David Smith, Secretary Ralph Webster, Treasurer Jon Beall, VP Advancement Marian Casey Patrick Dentler Nikki Graham Karen Kocher Mary Ann Neely James Nortey Geronimo Rodriguez Craig Smith Staff JJ Langston, Executive Director Emma Morris, Development/Marketing Associate

NAICS: 561
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dipjar.jpeg
DipJar
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/barton-springs-conservancy.jpeg
Barton Springs Conservancy
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
DipJar
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Barton Springs Conservancy
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DipJar in 2025.

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Barton Springs Conservancy in 2025.

Incident History — DipJar (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DipJar cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Barton Springs Conservancy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Barton Springs Conservancy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dipjar.jpeg
DipJar
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/barton-springs-conservancy.jpeg
Barton Springs Conservancy
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Barton Springs Conservancy company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to DipJar company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Barton Springs Conservancy company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to DipJar company.

In the current year, Barton Springs Conservancy company and DipJar company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Barton Springs Conservancy company nor DipJar company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Barton Springs Conservancy company nor DipJar company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Barton Springs Conservancy company nor DipJar company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither DipJar company nor Barton Springs Conservancy company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither DipJar nor Barton Springs Conservancy holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither DipJar company nor Barton Springs Conservancy company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

DipJar company employs more people globally than Barton Springs Conservancy company, reflecting its scale as a Fundraising.

Neither DipJar nor Barton Springs Conservancy holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither DipJar nor Barton Springs Conservancy holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither DipJar nor Barton Springs Conservancy holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither DipJar nor Barton Springs Conservancy holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither DipJar nor Barton Springs Conservancy holds HIPAA certification.

Neither DipJar nor Barton Springs Conservancy holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N