DIONS PIZZA
Last Update: 2025-03-16 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000
Excellent
None
NAICS: 722
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Comparison Overview
DIONS PIZZA
VS
Jimmy John's
Jimmy John's
Last Update: 2025-07-25 (UTC)
Excellent
Between 900 and 1000
THE SANDWICH OF SANDWICHES℠ At Jimmy John's, we don't make sandwiches. We make The Sandwich of Sandwiches℠. We use fresh vegetables because we don't hate salads, we just feel bad for them. We hand-slice our provolone cheese and meats in-house every day, because packaged pre-sliced meats doesn't have the same ring to it. And we bake bread all day, every day because stale bread isn't bread, it's... croutons. The flavors of fresh-veggies, combined with hand-sliced meats and fresh-baked bread is what makes a Jimmy John's sandwich The Sandwich of Sandwiches℠. For more information, visit jimmyjohns.com and InspireBrands.com. For careers, visit our careers site: careers.jimmyjohns.com Connect with us on social media: instagram.com/jimmyjohns facebook.com/jimmyjohns twitter.com/jimmyjohns tiktok.com/@jimmyjohns pinterest.com/jimmyjohns www.youtube.com/user/jimmyjohns www.InspireBrands.com This profile is for Jimmy John's Headquarters. Each Jimmy John's is independently owned and operated under a franchise agreement with Jimmy John's Franchise, LLC, franchisor of the JIMMY JOHN'S system. Any questions regarding employment must be directed to the franchise owner/operator. Jimmy John’s Franchise, LLC does not have access to franchisees’ employment records or specific rules for employment as defined by the franchisees.
NAICS: 7225
NAICS Definition: Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees: 18,724
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Compliance Badges Comparison
Security & Compliance Standards Overview
DIONS PIZZA
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC 2
Not verified
GDPR
No public badge
PCI DSS
No public badge
Jimmy John's
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC 2
Not verified
GDPR
No public badge
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
DIONS PIZZA
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Jimmy John's
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for DIONS PIZZA in 2025.
Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Jimmy John's in 2025.
Incident History — DIONS PIZZA (X = Date, Y = Severity)
DIONS PIZZA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Incident History — Jimmy John's (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Jimmy John's cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Notable Incidents
Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company
DIONS PIZZA
Incidents
No Incident
Jimmy John's
Incidents
FAQ
Both DIONS PIZZA company and Jimmy John's company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.
Jimmy John's company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas DIONS PIZZA company has not reported any.
In the current year, Jimmy John's company and DIONS PIZZA company have not reported any cyber incidents.
Neither Jimmy John's company nor DIONS PIZZA company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.
Neither Jimmy John's company nor DIONS PIZZA company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.
Jimmy John's company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while DIONS PIZZA company has not reported such incidents publicly.
Neither DIONS PIZZA company nor Jimmy John's company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.
Neither DIONS PIZZA company nor Jimmy John's company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.
Jimmy John's company employs more people globally than DIONS PIZZA company, reflecting its scale as a Restaurants.
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
A vulnerability has been found in GNU Binutils 2.45. The affected element is the function elf_swap_shdr in the library bfd/elfcode.h of the component Linker. The manipulation leads to heap-based buffer overflow. The attack must be carried out locally. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier of the patch is 9ca499644a21ceb3f946d1c179c38a83be084490. To fix this issue, it is recommended to deploy a patch. The code maintainer replied with "[f]ixed for 2.46".
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16353
- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33457
- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33457#c1
- https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=9ca499644a21ceb3f946d1c179c38a83be084490
- https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.326124
- https://vuldb.com/?id.326124
- https://vuldb.com/?submit.661277
- https://www.gnu.org/
Description
A flaw has been found in GNU Binutils 2.45. Impacted is the function _bfd_elf_parse_eh_frame of the file bfd/elf-eh-frame.c of the component Linker. Executing manipulation can lead to heap-based buffer overflow. The attack is restricted to local execution. The exploit has been published and may be used. This patch is called ea1a0737c7692737a644af0486b71e4a392cbca8. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue. The code maintainer replied with "[f]ixed for 2.46".
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16358
- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33464
- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33464#c2
- https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=ea1a0737c7692737a644af0486b71e4a392cbca8
- https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.326123
- https://vuldb.com/?id.326123
- https://vuldb.com/?submit.661276
- https://www.gnu.org/
Description
A vulnerability was detected in GNU Binutils 2.45. This issue affects the function dump_dwarf_section of the file binutils/objdump.c. Performing manipulation results in out-of-bounds read. The attack is only possible with local access. The exploit is now public and may be used. The patch is named f87a66db645caf8cc0e6fc87b0c28c78a38af59b. It is suggested to install a patch to address this issue.
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.7
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:P
cvss3
Base: 3.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
- https://github.com/user-attachments/files/20623354/hdf5_crash_3.txt
- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33406
- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33406#c2
- https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=f87a66db645caf8cc0e6fc87b0c28c78a38af59b
- https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.326122
- https://vuldb.com/?id.326122
- https://vuldb.com/?submit.661275
- https://www.gnu.org/
Description
A security vulnerability has been detected in zhuimengshaonian wisdom-education up to 1.0.4. This vulnerability affects the function selectStudentExamInfoList of the file src/main/java/com/education/api/controller/student/ExamInfoController.java. Such manipulation of the argument subjectId leads to improper authorization. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
- https://github.com/xkalami-Tta0/CVE/blob/main/wisdom-education/%E6%B0%B4%E5%B9%B3%E8%B6%8A%E6%9D%83.md
- https://github.com/xkalami-Tta0/CVE/blob/main/wisdom-education/%E6%B0%B4%E5%B9%B3%E8%B6%8A%E6%9D%83.md#vulnerability-reproduction
- https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.326121
- https://vuldb.com/?id.326121
- https://vuldb.com/?submit.661308
Description
A security flaw has been discovered in Campcodes Farm Management System 1.0. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality. The manipulation results in file and directory information exposure. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited.
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
