Comparison Overview

Dingeman & Dancer, PLC

VS

Montgomery Barnett

Dingeman & Dancer, PLC

810 Cottageview Drive, Traverse City, Michigan, 49684, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Dingeman & Dancer, PLC is a full-service law firm serving clients in the business, government, and nonprofit sectors, as well as individuals. Our experienced attorneys and leading technologies consistently deliver client-centered solutions. Our clients expect the best and we deliver by responding quickly to their needs, understanding their business issues, and providing outstanding legal advice. Since 1990, our attorneys have proudly represented a diverse range of clients—from individuals and new entities to Fortune 500 corporations. These are just a few reasons that our firm is repeatedly chosen and recommended by our clients.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Montgomery Barnett

3300 Energy Centre, New Orleans, LA, 70163, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Committed to Client Service Since 1892 For more than 120 years, the firm has been representing businesses, insurers, professionals, and government entities on the local, regional, national and international levels. The firm features a team of lawyers in New Orleans and Baton Rouge who possess wide-ranging legal experience and extensive knowledge of a variety of aspects of the law. The attorneys of Montgomery Barnett have earned a number of awards and recognition that distinguish them as being among the best in the legal profession. For example, one of the firm's partners, Daniel Lund, was the recipient of the Louisiana Bar Foundation's 2012 Curtis R. Boisfontaine Trial Advocacy Award in recognition of his long-standing devotion to excellence in trial practice. Click on the Services tab above to learn more about our firm and our areas of practice.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 28
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dingeman-dancer-&-christopherson-plc.jpeg
Dingeman & Dancer, PLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/montgomery-barnett.jpeg
Montgomery Barnett
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Dingeman & Dancer, PLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Montgomery Barnett
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dingeman & Dancer, PLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Montgomery Barnett in 2025.

Incident History — Dingeman & Dancer, PLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dingeman & Dancer, PLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Montgomery Barnett (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Montgomery Barnett cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dingeman-dancer-&-christopherson-plc.jpeg
Dingeman & Dancer, PLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/montgomery-barnett.jpeg
Montgomery Barnett
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Dingeman & Dancer, PLC company and Montgomery Barnett company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Montgomery Barnett company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Dingeman & Dancer, PLC company.

In the current year, Montgomery Barnett company and Dingeman & Dancer, PLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Montgomery Barnett company nor Dingeman & Dancer, PLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Montgomery Barnett company nor Dingeman & Dancer, PLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Montgomery Barnett company nor Dingeman & Dancer, PLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Dingeman & Dancer, PLC company nor Montgomery Barnett company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Dingeman & Dancer, PLC nor Montgomery Barnett holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Dingeman & Dancer, PLC company nor Montgomery Barnett company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Montgomery Barnett company employs more people globally than Dingeman & Dancer, PLC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Dingeman & Dancer, PLC nor Montgomery Barnett holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Dingeman & Dancer, PLC nor Montgomery Barnett holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Dingeman & Dancer, PLC nor Montgomery Barnett holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Dingeman & Dancer, PLC nor Montgomery Barnett holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Dingeman & Dancer, PLC nor Montgomery Barnett holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Dingeman & Dancer, PLC nor Montgomery Barnett holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X