Comparison Overview

digitalis.io

VS

The Macgregor Group

digitalis.io

Kemp House, London, undefined, EC1V 2NX, GB
Last Update: 2025-03-11 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

Data, Streaming and Cloud Experts - Digitalis provides development, design and implementation through to fully managed 24x7 operations for your Apache Kafka, Apache Cassandra and Data platforms on all clouds and on-premises. We help our customers adopt and deploy Kubernetes and the latest Data and Streaming technologies. With our experience of cloud and infrastructure agnostic implementations avoiding vendor lock-ins, our customers can maintain commercial flexibility, agility and security across their infrastructure, applications and data.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Macgregor Group

Last Update: 2025-03-15 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

A Leading Trade Order Management System Company. The flag ship product was Predator, an robust equity trading system. Macgregor took over Merrin Financial. Macgregor later was acquired by ITG (Investment Technology Group). Macgregor product and services consists of Merrin XIP - Portfolio and Trading system, MFN - Electronic Trading Network utilizing FIX Message, CompAlert - Enterprise compliance system, Macgregor Post Trade - CTM and post trade instruction notifications.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001+
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/digitalis-io.jpeg
digitalis.io
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
The Macgregor Group
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
digitalis.io
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Macgregor Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for digitalis.io in 2025.

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Macgregor Group in 2025.

Incident History โ€” digitalis.io (X = Date, Y = Severity)

digitalis.io cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” The Macgregor Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Macgregor Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/digitalis-io.jpeg
digitalis.io
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
The Macgregor Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both digitalis.io company and The Macgregor Group company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, The Macgregor Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to digitalis.io company.

In the current year, The Macgregor Group company and digitalis.io company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Macgregor Group company nor digitalis.io company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Macgregor Group company nor digitalis.io company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Macgregor Group company nor digitalis.io company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither digitalis.io company nor The Macgregor Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither digitalis.io company nor The Macgregor Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

digitalis.io company employs more people globally than The Macgregor Group company, reflecting its scale as a Information Technology & Services.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Formbricks is an open source qualtrics alternative. Prior to version 4.0.1, Formbricks is missing JWT signature verification. This vulnerability stems from a token validation routine that only decodes JWTs (jwt.decode) without verifying their signatures. Both the email verification token login path and the password reset server action use the same validator, which does not check the tokenโ€™s signature, expiration, issuer, or audience. If an attacker learns the victimโ€™s actual user.id, they can craft an arbitrary JWT with an alg: "none" header and use it to authenticate and reset the victimโ€™s password. This issue has been patched in version 4.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

Apollo Studio Embeddable Explorer & Embeddable Sandbox are website embeddable software solutions from Apollo GraphQL. Prior to Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3, a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified. The vulnerability arises from missing origin validation in the client-side code that handles window.postMessage events. A malicious website can send forged messages to the embedding page, causing the victimโ€™s browser to execute arbitrary GraphQL queries or mutations against their GraphQL server while authenticated with the victimโ€™s cookies. This issue has been patched in Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /consulta-dispensas. Such manipulation leads to improper authorization. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected is an unknown function of the file /module/Api/aluno. This manipulation of the argument aluno_id causes improper authorization. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in Tencent WeKnora 0.1.0. This impacts the function testEmbeddingModel of the file /api/v1/initialization/embedding/test. The manipulation of the argument baseUrl results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component. The vendor responds: "We have confirmed that the issue mentioned in the report does not exist in the latest releases".

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X