Comparison Overview

digitalis.io

VS

Exela Technologies

digitalis.io

Kemp House, London, undefined, EC1V 2NX, GB
Last Update: 2025-03-11 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

Data, Streaming and Cloud Experts - Digitalis provides development, design and implementation through to fully managed 24x7 operations for your Apache Kafka, Apache Cassandra and Data platforms on all clouds and on-premises. We help our customers adopt and deploy Kubernetes and the latest Data and Streaming technologies. With our experience of cloud and infrastructure agnostic implementations avoiding vendor lock-ins, our customers can maintain commercial flexibility, agility and security across their infrastructure, applications and data.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Exela Technologies

2701 E. Grauwyler Road, Irving, Texas , 75061, US
Last Update: 2025-03-04 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

Exela is a business process automation (BPA) leader, leveraging a global footprint and proprietary technology to provide digital transformation solutions enhancing quality, productivity, and end-user experience. With decades of expertise operating mission-critical processes, Exela serves a growing roster of more than 4,000 customers throughout 50 countries, including over 60% of the Fortune ยฎ 100. With foundational technologies spanning information management, workflow automation, and integrated communications, Exelaโ€™s software and services include multi-industry department solution suites addressing finance, accounting, human capital management, and legal management, as well as industry-specific solutions for banking, healthcare, insurance, and public sectors. Through cloud-enabled platforms, built on a configurable stack of automation modules, and over 17,500 employees operating in 23 countries, Exela rapidly deploys integrated technology and operations as an end-to-end digital journey partner. Twitter: @ExelaTech Facebook: @exelatechnologies Instagram: @exelatechnologies Investor Site: https://investors.exelatech.com/

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 10,089
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/digitalis-io.jpeg
digitalis.io
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/exela-technologies.jpeg
Exela Technologies
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
digitalis.io
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Exela Technologies
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for digitalis.io in 2025.

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Exela Technologies in 2025.

Incident History โ€” digitalis.io (X = Date, Y = Severity)

digitalis.io cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Exela Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Exela Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/digitalis-io.jpeg
digitalis.io
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/exela-technologies.jpeg
Exela Technologies
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both digitalis.io company and Exela Technologies company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Exela Technologies company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to digitalis.io company.

In the current year, Exela Technologies company and digitalis.io company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Exela Technologies company nor digitalis.io company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Exela Technologies company nor digitalis.io company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Exela Technologies company nor digitalis.io company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither digitalis.io company nor Exela Technologies company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Exela Technologies company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to digitalis.io company.

Exela Technologies company employs more people globally than digitalis.io company, reflecting its scale as a Information Technology & Services.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Formbricks is an open source qualtrics alternative. Prior to version 4.0.1, Formbricks is missing JWT signature verification. This vulnerability stems from a token validation routine that only decodes JWTs (jwt.decode) without verifying their signatures. Both the email verification token login path and the password reset server action use the same validator, which does not check the tokenโ€™s signature, expiration, issuer, or audience. If an attacker learns the victimโ€™s actual user.id, they can craft an arbitrary JWT with an alg: "none" header and use it to authenticate and reset the victimโ€™s password. This issue has been patched in version 4.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

Apollo Studio Embeddable Explorer & Embeddable Sandbox are website embeddable software solutions from Apollo GraphQL. Prior to Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3, a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified. The vulnerability arises from missing origin validation in the client-side code that handles window.postMessage events. A malicious website can send forged messages to the embedding page, causing the victimโ€™s browser to execute arbitrary GraphQL queries or mutations against their GraphQL server while authenticated with the victimโ€™s cookies. This issue has been patched in Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /consulta-dispensas. Such manipulation leads to improper authorization. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected is an unknown function of the file /module/Api/aluno. This manipulation of the argument aluno_id causes improper authorization. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in Tencent WeKnora 0.1.0. This impacts the function testEmbeddingModel of the file /api/v1/initialization/embedding/test. The manipulation of the argument baseUrl results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component. The vendor responds: "We have confirmed that the issue mentioned in the report does not exist in the latest releases".

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X